Skip to main content
. 2013 Aug 30;13:218. doi: 10.1186/1471-244X-13-218

Table 1.

Psychometric properties of odor interpretation and odor naming tasks in the schizophrenia sample (N=881)

  Odor naminga Odor interpretation (odors)b   Odor interpretation (attributes)b
Item difficulty (weighted % correct naming ± 95%CI)
Pineapple
21.71 ± 0.01
73.0 ± 1.7
Pleasant
81.7 ± 1.2
Petrol
38.67 ± 0.02
78.2 ± 1.3
Sweet
72.6 ± 1.1
Mint
76.35 ± 0.03
78.0 ± 1.2
Hot
69.5 ± 1.4
Rose
39.99 ± 0.02
80.2 ± 1.3
Technical
81.3 ± 1.1
Natural gas
16.61 ± 0.02
70.9 ± 1.6
Natural
75.1 ± 1.3
Licorice
54.48 ± 0.03
82.3 ± 1.3
Edible
80.4 ± 1.2
 
 
 
Dangerous
79.5 ± 1.1
Item discrimination, part-whole corrected [95%CI]
Pineapple
0.24 [0.18, 0.30]
0.21 [0.15,0.27]
Pleasant
0.46 [0.40,0.51]
Petrol
0.25 [0.19, 0.31]
0.25 [0.19,0.31]
Sweet
0.33 [0.27,0.39]
Mint
0.30 [0.24, 0.36]
0.27 [0.20,0.33]
Hot
0.18 [0.11, 0.24]
Rose
0.28 [0.21, 0.34]
0.18 [0.11,0.24]
Technical
0.58 [0.53, 0.62]
Natural gas
0.13 [0.07, 0.20]
0.16 [0.09,0.22]
Natural
0.45 [0.40,0.50]
Licorice
0.27 [0.20, 0.33]
0.20 [0.14,0.27]
Edible
0.52 [0.47,0.56]
 
 
 
Dangerous
0.52 [0.47,0.56]
Item discrimination, not part-whole corrected [95%CI]
Pineapple
0.41 [0.35, 0.46]
0.57 [0.52,0.61]
Pleasant
0.63 [0.59,0.67]
Petrol
0.50 [0.45, 0.54]
0.53 [0.48,0.58]
Sweet
0.52 [0.47,0.56]
Mint
0.60 [0.55, 0.64]
0.52 [0.47,0.57]
Hot
0.44 [0.38,0.49]
Rose
0.56 [0.51, 0.61]
0.45 [0.40,0.50]
Technical
0.72 [0.69,0.75]
Natural gas
0.33 [0.26, 0.39]
0.50 [0.45, 0.55]
Natural
0.64 [0.60,0.68]
Licorice
0.65 [0.62, 0.69]
0.48 [0.43,0.53]
Edible
0.68 [0.64,0.71]
 
 
 
Dangerous
0.66 [0.62,0.70]
Internal consistency (standardized Cronbach’s α, equals average split-half reliability)
  0.50 [0.47, 0.54] 0.44 [0.40,0.48]   0.72 [0.71,0.74]

Abbreviations: CI, confidence interval. aPsychometric measures were calculated based on Spearman correlation (ordinal data). bPsychometric measures were calculated based on Pearson correlation (metric data).