Table 2.
Univariate logistic regression analyses of risk factors associated with the presence of LVDD
| OR (95% CI) | p | |
|---|---|---|
| Age |
1.02 (0.99–1.04) |
0.14 |
| Gender |
1.53 (0.80–2.94) |
0.21 |
| BMI |
1.05 (0.92–1.20) |
0.45 |
| DM |
1.66 (0.83–3.31) |
0.15 |
| Hypertension |
4.11 (1.80–9.42) |
<0.001 |
| Ln(LDL) |
3.38 (1.01–11.36) |
0.049 |
| Ln(TG) |
0.95 (0.48–1.88) |
0.88 |
| Ln(Visceral fat) |
2.09 (1.18–3.68) |
0.01 |
| Ln(Peritoneal fat) |
1.92 (1.22–3.02) |
0.005 |
| hsCRP |
2.09 (1.56–2.79) |
<0.001 |
| Ln(LV mass index) |
4.98 (1.10–22.64) |
0.03 |
| EpF | 1.75 (1.41–2.17) | <0.001 |
Abbreviations:LVDD, left ventricular diastolic dysfunction; OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval; BMI, body mass index; DM, diabetes mellitus; Ln(LDL), natural logarithm of low-density lipoprotein; TG, triglyceride; hsCRP, high-sensitivity C-reactive protein; LV, left ventricular; EpF, epicardial fat. ORs and 95% CIs were estimated by logistic regression.