Table 2.
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1. Age | . | ||||||
2. Race | .15* | . | |||||
3. Education | .20** | .32** | . | ||||
4. Income | .33** | .35** | .40** | . | |||
5. GRS | −.04 | −.19 | −.18** | −.18** | . | ||
6. Intimacy Interference | −.01 | −.09 | −.07 | −.02 | .14** | . | |
7. UAI acts | −.01 | .04 | −.03 | .05 | .08 | .25** | . |
8. PAI acts | −.06 | −.04 | .03 | .08 | .13* | −.09 | .08 |
GRS: gay-related stigma; UAI: unprotected anal intercourse; PAI: protected anal intercourse.
Bivariate relationships were evaluated using phi coefficients (between dichotomous variables), rho coefficients (between dichotomous and normally distributed variables), Pearson’s correlations (between normally distributed variables), Kendall’s tau (between nonnormally distributed; normally and nonnormally distributed; and dichotomous and nonnormally distributed variables).
p < .05;
p < .01.