Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Jun 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Health Psychol. 2013 Mar 21;19(6):711–720. doi: 10.1177/1359105313478643

Table 3.

Results of negative binomial regression models.

Exp(B) 95% CI Exp(B) 95% CI
UAI acts
  Intercept 4.03** 3.45, 4.71 3.80** 3.24, 4.46
  Intimacy 1.49** 1.26, 1.77 1.52** 1.28, 1.80
  Interference
  Gay-related stigma 1.14 0.90, 1.45 1.09 0.86, 1.38
  Interaction 1.32* 1.04, 1.67
Likelihood ratio χ2step(2) = 30.22** Likelihood ratio χ2step(1) = 5.66*
Likelihood ratio χ2model(3) = 35.88**
  Test of simple slopes for UAI acts
    High gay-related stigma 2.30** 1.92, 2.76
    Low gay-related stigma 1.37** 1.13, 1.66
PAI acts
  Intercept 3.22** 2.74, 3.78 4.25** 2.76, 3.83
  Intimacy 0.76** 0.64, 0.91 0.76** 0.64, 0.81
  Interference
  Gay-related stigma 1.56** 1.22, 1.98 1.58** 1.24, 2.02
  Interaction 0.94 0.76, 1.16
Likelihood ratio χ2step(2) = 17.63** Likelihood ratio χ2step(1) = 0.34
Likelihood ratio χ2model(3) = 17.97**

UAI: unprotected anal intercourse; PAI: protected anal intercourse; CI: confidence interval.

*

p < .05;

**

p < .01.