Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Jun 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Psycholinguist Res. 2014 Jun;43(3):209–224. doi: 10.1007/s10936-013-9248-4

Table 1.

Language testing data

Assessment P1 P2 P3 P4 P5 P6 P7 P8 P9 P10 Mean
Western Aphasia Battery-Revised
Aphasia quotient 77.6 89.6 65 71.7 80 87.8 58.9 83 74.3 78 76.6
Fluency 5 5 4 4 5 6 2 5 5 5 4.6
Information content 9 10 8 9 9 9 7 9 8 10 8.8
Auditory verbal comprehension 7.8 10 7.5 8.45 8.4 9.6 6.95 9.8 7.45 7.9 8.4
Repetition (words, phrases, and sentences) 9.4 10 6.2 5.1 8.6 10 7.6 8.8 8.4 7.6 8.2
Naming and word finding 7.6 9.8 6.8 9.3 9 9.3 5.9 8.9 8.3 8.5 8.3
Boston Naming Test
Spontaneously given correct responses 57 54 33 49 53 58 31 60 40 38 47.3
Northwestern Assessment of Verbs and Sentences
Verb naming
1 argument verbs 80 100 100 100 100 100 80 100 60 100 92.0
2 argument verbs 90 100 80 100 100 100 40 90 90 100 89.0
3 argument verbs 71 71 71 100 86 86 71 71 71 71 76.9
Verb comprehension 100 100 100 100 100 100 95 100 100 100 99.5
Argument Structure Production
1 argument verbs 100 100 80 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 98.0
2 argument verbs 100 100 60 100 100 100 93 100 100 100 95.3
3 argument verbs 67 92 42 58 50 92 42 83 83 83 69.2
Sentence Production Priming Test
Canonical 53 100 N/A 33 87 100 N/A 93 N/A N/A 77.8
Non canonical 20 100 N/A 0 53 87 N/A 67 N/A N/A 54.4
Sentence Comprehension Test
Canonical 53 100 N/A 87 93 100 60 87 N/A 60 80.0
Non canonical 67 87 N/A 80 93 100 60 73 N/A 73 79.2

Agrammatic participants’ language testing data. N/A = not available (subtest discontinued by participant)