Skip to main content
. 2013 Aug 22;2013:274274. doi: 10.1155/2013/274274

Table 2.

Liver protective effect on liver homogenate parameters of different experimental groups.

Treatment MDA
(nmol/g protein)1
NO
(µM/mg protein)1
SOD
(U/mg protein)1
FRAP
(mM FeII/mg protein)1
Normal control (PBS) 3.20 ± 0.22a 10.13 ± 0.18a 17.17 ± 0.74a 9.42 ± 1.0 a
Ethanol control (50% ETOH + PBS) 7.25 ± 0.08 15.09 ± 0.86 12.46 ± 2.51 5.28 ± 0.01
Positive control (50% ETOH + silybin (50 mg/kg)) 4.95 ± 0.08a 10.20 ± 3.08a 18.54 ± 0.37a 15.02 ± 0.07a
50% ETOH + SBE (200 mg/kg) 3.02 ± 0.25a 9.55 ± 0.35a 19.38 ± 0.10a 6.59 ± 0.03
50% ETOH + SBE (1000 mg/kg) 2.93 ± 0.34a 9.54 ± 0.04a 20.08 ± 1.58a 6.24 ± 0.04
50% ETOH + NESTE (200 mg/kg) 2.22 ± 0.17a 9.55 ± 0.58a 19.44 ± 0.67a 9.42 ± 0.02a
50% ETOH + NESTE (1000 mg/kg) 1.34 ± 0.23a 8.45 ± 0.27a 20.53 ± 0.24a 12.78 ± 0.10a

1Values are expressed as mean ± S.E.M (n = 8), avalues are significantly different from ethanol control (P < 0.05), MDA: malondialdehyde, NO: nitric oxide, SOD: superoxide dismutase, FRAP: ferric reducing antioxidant power.