Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Sep 8.
Published in final edited form as: Biometrics. 2010 Sep;66(3):675–683. doi: 10.1111/j.1541-0420.2009.01328.x

Table 2.

Mean and 95% CI for the numbers of false positives (FP) and false negatives (FN) of each method under 8 simulation models without outliers.

Model CBS FP HMM FP BMCP FP CBS FN HMM FN BMCP FN
M1 0.04 [0, 0] 0 [0, 0] 0.04 [0, 0.78] 0 [0, 0] 0 [0, 0] 0.44 [0, 1.78]
M2 0.04 [0, 0] 0.02 [0, 0] 0.02 [0, 0] 0 [0, 0] 0 [0, 0] 1 [0, 2]
M3 0.04 [0, 0] 0.04 [0, 0] 0.06 [0, 1] 0 [0, 0] 0 [0, 0] 0.14 [0, 1]
M4 0.04 [0, 0] 0 [0, 0] 0.14 [0, 1.78] 0 [0, 0] 0 [0, 0] 0.42 [0, 2]
M5 0.04 [0, 0] 0 [0, 0] 0 [0, 0] 0 [0, 0] 0 [0, 0] 0.26 [0, 1.78]
M6 0.08 [0, 0] 0 [0, 0] 0.04 [0, 0.78] 0 [0, 0] 0 [0, 0] 0.08 [0, 1]
M7 0 [0, 0] 0.34 [0, 0.78] 0 [0, 0] 0 [0, 0] 0 [0, 0] 1.26 [0, 2.78]
M8 0.16 [0, 2] 0.16 [0, 2] 0 [0, 0] 0 [0, 0] 0 [0, 0] 0.54 [0, 2]