Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Sep 8.
Published in final edited form as: Biometrics. 2010 Sep;66(3):675–683. doi: 10.1111/j.1541-0420.2009.01328.x

Table 3.

Mean and 95% CI for the numbers of false positives (FP) and false negatives (FN) of each method under 8 simulation models with outliers.

Model CBS FP HMM FP BMCP FP CBS FN HMM FN BMCP FN
M1 1.36 [0, 4] 5.68 [2, 9.55] 0.10 [0, 1] 0 [0, 0] 0 [0, 0] 0.74 [0, 2]
M2 0.12 [0, 2] 0.88 [0, 12] 0 [0, 0] 0 [0, 0] 0 [0, 0] 0.96[0,2]
M3 1.02 [0, 4] 3.18 [0, 2] 0 [0, 0] 0 [0, 0] 0 [0, 0] 0.24 [0, 1]
M4 1.72 [0, 6] 4.80 [2, 6] 0 [0, 0] 0 [0, 0] 0 [0, 0] 0.64 [0, 2]
M5 0.94 [0, 3.78] 4.24 [2, 6] 0.10 [0, 1] 0 [0, 0] 0 [0, 0] 0.22 [0, 1]
M6 1.64 [0, 4] 4.40 [2, 6] 0.18 [0, 2] 0 [0, 0] 0 [0, 0] 0.32 [0, 1]
M7 0.20 [0, 2] 2.94 [0, 19.55] 0 [0, 0] 0 [0, 0] 0 [0, 0] 1.28 [0, 3]
M8 0.08 [0, 1.55] 3.52 [0, 17.10] 0 [0, 0] 0 [0, 0] 0 [0, 0] 0.96 [0, 2]