Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Sep 9.
Published in final edited form as: J Eur Econ Assoc. 2010 Sep;8(5):947–988. doi: 10.1111/j.1542-4774.2010.tb00545.x

Table 3.

Timing of winning bids by type of participant.

Dependent variable: Timing
Chit value/contribution: Low
Medium
High
Year: 1993 1994 1993 1994 1993 1994
(1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6)
A. Groups partitioned by chit value
Corporate subscriber −0.124 −0.124 −0.105 −0.144 −0.151 −0.118
(0.005) (0.006) (0.007) (0.006) (0.010) (0.008)
Constant 0.535 0.543 0.530 0.543 0.529 0.541
(0.002) (0.003) (0.003) (0.003) (0.003) (0.004)
Number of observations 21,400 14,635 14,300 13,411 7,555 6,750
B. Groups partitioned by contribution
Corporate subscriber −0.122 −0.117 −0.114 −0.147 −0.134 −0.126
(0.005) (0.006) (0.007) (0.006) (0.009) (0.007)
Constant 0.534 0.540 0.532 0.544 0.529 0.543
(0.002) (0.003) (0.003) (0.003) (0.003) (0.003)
Number of observations 19,910 12,815 14,330 13,321 9,015 8,660

Note: Timing is measured as the winning month divided by the total duration of the group.Corporate subscriber equals one if finance company, zero otherwise.

Chit value: Low if chit value = 10,000; Medium if chit value 10,000–50,000; High if chit value ≥ 50,000.Contribution: Low if contribution < 500/month; Medium if contribution 500–1,000; High if contribution > 1,000.The individual subscriber is the unit of observation.Standard errors in parentheses.