Skip to main content
. 2013 Jun 6;14(5):687–701. doi: 10.1007/s10162-013-0396-x

TABLE 2.

Error matrix for the classification of the 338 exemplars of four audiometric phenotypes determined by a human expert (rows) and by Quadratic Discriminant Analysis (QDA), Support Vector Machines (SVM), and Random Forests (RF) (columns). Overall accuracy of the three methods was 93.2, 89.9, and 89.3 %, respectively

Older-normal Metabolic Sensory Metabolic + Sensory Percent correct
QDA
Older-normal 36 0 1 0 97.3
Metabolic 0 79 0 6 92.9
Sensory 0 1 74 3 94.9
Metabolic + Sensory 0 9 3 126 91.3
SVM
Older-normal 37 0 0 0 100.0
Metabolic 0 70 1 14 82.4
Sensory 0 2 76 0 97.4
Metabolic + Sensory 0 15 2 121 87.7
RF
Older-normal 37 0 0 0 100.0
Metabolic 0 71 2 12 83.5
Sensory 1 1 73 3 93.6
Metabolic + Sensory 0 14 1 123 89.1