Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Aug 1.
Published in final edited form as: Learn Individ Differ. 2013 Feb 8;26:177–184. doi: 10.1016/j.lindif.2013.01.008
Late talker measure Participants (N) Unadjusted


Weak ability Typical ability OR 95% CI
Risk for age 8 weak oral language
Vocabulary above 10th percentile (referent) 46 198
Vocabulary below 10th percentile 26 43 2.6 [1.5, 4.7]
Combining words often (referent) 27 161
Not yet combining words 16 18 5.3 [2.4, 11.6]
Combining words some 24 60 2.4 [1.3, 4.5]
Risk for age 8 weak word reading
Vocabulary above 10th percentile (referent) 73 254
Vocabulary below 10th percentile 28 52 1.9 [1.1, 3.2]
Combining words often (referent) 46 186
Not yet combining words 18 35 2.1 [1.1, 4.0]
Combining words some 33 81 1.6 [1.0, 2.8]
Risk for age 8 weak reading comprehension
Vocabulary above 10th percentile (referent) 22 103
Vocabulary below 10th percentile 13 22 3.6 [1.5, 8.4]
Risk for age 8 poor reading comprehension (continued)
Combining words often (referent) 9 79
Not yet combining words 9 9 8.8 [2.8, 27.8]
Combining sometimes 14 31 4.0 [1.6, 10.1]
Risk for age 8 weak math ability
Vocabulary above 10th percentile (referent) 30 137
Vocabulary below 10th percentile 17 30 3.0 [1.4, 6.2]
Combining words often (referent) 18 107
Not yet combining words 13 15 5.2 [2.1, 12.6]
Combining sometimes 14 38 2.2 [1.0, 4.8]

Notes. Children with weak oral language at age 8 scored 1 SD or more below the mean on at least 2 of 4 oral language measures,or 2 SD or more below the mean on 1 oral language measure (Cohen, Davine, Horodezky, Lipsett, & Isaacson, 1993). Children with weak academic abilities (word reading, reading comprehension, broad math) scored at the 25th percentile or below on the relevant subtest (Word Attack, Passage Comprehension, Broad Math) of the Woodcock–Johnson Psychoeducational Battery, Revised (Woodcock & Johnson, 1990).