. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Sep 1.

Published in final edited form as: J Psychopathol Behav Assess. 2013 Mar 27;35(3):301–313. doi: 10.1007/s10862-013-9349-2

Table 1.

Multi-trait Multi-method correlation matrix

	LPL-C	LPV-C	NU-C	PU-C	SS-P	LPL-P	LPV-P	NU-P	PU-P
SS-C	.16	−.13	.02	.14	.38^**	.23^*	−.05	.03	.01
LPL-C		.45^**	.22^*	.31^**	.18^*	.20^*	.19^*	−.04	.01
LPV-C			.15	.05	.12	.33^**	.38^**	.14	.19^*
NU-C				.60^**	.15	.24^*	.15	.30^**	.19^*
PU-C					.18^*	.27^**	.29^**	.18^*	.24^*
SS-P						.30^**	−.07	.13	.10
LPL-P							.51^**	.56^**	.64^**
LPV-P								.29^**	.40^**
NU-P									.69^**
PU-P

Methods: SS-C: child sensation seeking; LPL-C: child lack of planning; LPV-C: child lack of perseverance; NU-C: child negative urgency; PU-C: child positive urgency; SS-P: parent sensation seeking; LPL-P: parent lack of planning; LPV-P: parent lack of perseverance; NU-P: parent negative urgency; PU-P: parent positive urgency. Correlations in bold are monotrait, heteromethod correlations.

p < 0.05

^**

p < 0.01