Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Sep 10.
Published in final edited form as: Int J Med Inform. 2012 Jun 27;82(3):201–208. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2012.05.012

Table 2.

Values given by the expert to the relationship between the defining characteristics DC and diagnoses of NANDA – I (see Table 1) before the training of the model.

ND1 ND2 ND3 ND4 ND5 ND6
DC1 0.75 0.6 0 0.2 0 0.5
DC2 0.75 0.1 0 0.8 0.2 0
DC3 0.5 0 0 0 0 0.6
DC4 0.3 0 0 0 0 0.2
DC5 0.3 0 0.5 0 0 1
DC6 1 0.7 0 0 0 0
DC7 0.7 0 0.1 0 0 0
DC8 0.9 0 0.6 0 0 0
DC9 1 0 0.6 0 0 0
DC10 0.6 0.1 0.1 0.2 0 0.5
DC11 0.9 0 0 0 0.9 0
DC12 0 1 0 0 0 0.2
DC13 0 0 0.8 0 0 0
DC14 0 0 0.9 0 0 0
DC15 0.2 0 0.9 0 0 0
DC16 0 0 0.5 0 0 0.1
DC17 0.1 0 0.9 0 0 0.4
DC18 0 0 0.5 0 0 0.4
DC19 0.3 0.2 0.9 0 0.1 0
DC20 0.2 0 0.9 0 0 0.9
DC21 0 0 0.9 0 0 0
DC22 0.7 0 0.5 0 0 0
DC23 0 0.2 0 1 0 0.3
DC24 0.5 0.3 0 0.8 0 0
DC25 0.2 0 0.5 0.6 0 0
DC26 0 0 0 0.6 0 0
DC27 0.5 0 0 0 1 0
DC28 0.9 0 0 0 0.9 0
DC29 0 0 0 0 0.7 0
DC30 0.8 0.9 0 0.1 0.7 0.1
DC31 0.7 0.9 0 0 0.7 0
DC32 0 0.2 0 0.2 0 0.9
DC33 0 0 0.2 0 0 0.9
DC34 0.1 0 0 0 0 0.7
DC35 0 0 0 0 0 0.7
DC36 0 0 0.1 0 0 0.7
DC37 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.1 0 0.7
DC38 0 0 0 0.1 0 0.9
DC39 0 0 0 0 0 0.8