Table 2.
Identification of isolates of P. tolaasii and P.” reactans” using Biolog identification system
| P. tolaassii isolates | Identification | Probability (%) | Similitude | Distance | P. “reactans” isolates. | Identification | Probjbilily (%) | Similitude | Distance |
| JCM 21583* | P. tolaasii | 100 | 0,833 | 0,98 | NCPPB1311* | P. flourescens | 97 | 0:885 | 1,27 |
| ECAGTI 1 | “ | 90 | 0,610 | 4,86 | ECAGRI1 | Pseudomonas spp. | - | 0,296* | 6,04* |
| ECAGTI2 | “ | 100 | 0,933 | 1 | ECAGRI2 | P. flourescens | 93 | 0,827 | 2,02 |
| ECAGTI3 | “ | 100 | 1 | 0 | ECAGRI3 | P. flourescens | 96 | 0,754 | 3.38 |
| ECAGTI 4 | “ | 100 | 0,865 | 2 | ECAGRI4 | P. flourescens | 99 | 0,608 | 5,87 |
| BCAGTI 5 | “ | 89 | 0,635 | 4,06 | ECAGRI5 | P. marginalis | 100 | 0,861 | 2,05 |
| ECAGTI 6 | “ | 92 | 0,559 | 6,09 | ECAGRI6 | Pseudomonas spp. | - | 0,416** | 4,12* |
| ECAGTI 7 | - | 100 | 0,933 | 1 | ECAGRI7 | P. gingeri | 88 | 0,733 | 3,15 |
| ECAGTI 8 | “ | 100 | 0,853 | 2,19 | ECAGRI8 | P. gingeri | 70 | 0,507 | 2,49 |
| ECAGTI 9 | - | 100 | 0,953 | 0,7 | |||||
| ECAGTI 10 | “ | 99 | 0,886. | 1,63 | |||||
| ECAGTI 11 | “ | ]100 | 0,930 | 1,01 | |||||
| ECAGTI 12 | “ | 100 | 0,853 | 2,19 | |||||
| ECAGTI 13 | “ | 100 | 0,940 | 0,89 | |||||
| ECAGTI 14 | “ | 100 | 0,965 | 0,51 | |||||
| ECAGTI 15 | “ | 100 | 0,919 | 1,21 | |||||
| ECAGTI l6 | 100 | 0,865 | 2 | ||||||
| ECAGTI 17 | - | 100 | 0,894 | 1,53 | |||||
| ECAGTI 18 | “ | 100 | 0,884 | 1,73 | |||||
| ECAGTI 19 | 100 | 0,890 | 1,63 | ||||||
FPP=Fluorescent pigment production, YG=Yellowish-green pigment, Y=Yellow pigment; *White line assay run on KB medium (Wong and Preece, 1979), - = absence of character whereas + = a weak WLA reaction and ++ = a strong WLA reaction.