Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Sep 10.
Published in final edited form as: Field methods. 2012 Apr 20;24(2):175–193. doi: 10.1177/1525822X11433997

Table 3.

Network Position Comparison: Cross-Links and Multiply Nominated Direct Recruits (DR2+)

Dependent Variable Coefficient for Cross-Linksa
Unadjustedb Adjustedc
Average Degree −7.24 ** (1.99) −2.94 (1.98)
Race Heterogeneity −0.10 ** (0.03) −0.07 * (0.03)
Local Net Density −0.05 * (0.02) −0.03 (0.02)
Closeness Centrality −0.01 * (0.004) −0.004 (0.004)
In Largest Component 1.89 (1.05) 2.19 * (1.06)
In Largest Bicomponent 0.30 (0.40) 0.49 (0.42)
a

Multiply nominated direct recruits is the reference category

b

Unadjusted includes a recruitment category dummy only

c

Adjusted controls for age, race, sex, and risk group, with a dummy for recruitment category.

d

Logistic regressions were used for modeling membership in the largest component/bicomponent. OLS regressions were used for all other models.