Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Oct 1.
Published in final edited form as: Hear Res. 2013 Jun 18;304:41–48. doi: 10.1016/j.heares.2013.06.003

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

Mice heterozygous for deafwaddler alleles perform equally well as wild-type in rotarod and swim tests. (A) Percentage of mice of each genotype that passed training criteria for rotarod (open bars) and swim (gray bars) tests. All of the wild-type and +/dfwi5 mice passed qualification while none of the dfwi5/dfwi5 mice could be tested. (B) Average latency to fall in rotarod tests are shown for grouped wild-type littermates (open bar) and each heterozygous deafwaddler strain (hashed bars). (C) Each mouse was assessed for their ability to swim by scoring for swimming style and vigor on a 3-point scale (see methods). Error bars represent SEM.