Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Oct 1.
Published in final edited form as: Glycoconj J. 2013 Apr 21;30(7):701–707. doi: 10.1007/s10719-013-9476-8

Table 1.

Stomach tissue sample descriptions.

Case Tissue
Type
Tissue Dry
Weight
(mg)
Sex Age Tumor
Size
Lymph
Nodes
Metastasis Prognosisa Histologyb
1 Normal 0.694 M 65
2 Normal 0.693 F 63
3 Normal 1.53 M 72
4 Normal 45.0 M 35
5 Normal 59.0 M 43
6 Gastric adenoma 1.56 F 72 Tubular adenoma, Low grade
7 Gastric adenoma 1.48 M 59 Tubular adenoma, Low grade
8 Gastric adenoma 0.541 F 68 Tubular adenoma, Low grade
9 EGC 2.97 M 71 T1b Negative Negative Alive Adenocarcinoma (MD)
10 EGC 17.9 F 57 T1a Negative Negative Alive Adenocarcinoma (WD)
11 EGC 3.00 F 75 T1a Negative Negative Alive Adenocarcinoma (MD)
12 AGC 0.263 M 72 T4a Positive Negative Alive Adenocarcinoma (MD)
13 AGC 26.3 M 75 T4a Positive Negative Dead Signet ring cell carcinoma
14 AGC 88.3 M 59 T4 Positive Negative Alive Adenocaricnoma (PD)
15 AGC 4.29 F 72 T2 Positive Negative Alive Adenocaricnoma (MD)
16 AGC 44.5 M 35 T3 Positive Negative Alive Adenocaricnoma (PD)
17 AGC 43.4 M 43 T1 Negative Negative Alive Adenocaricnoma (PD)
a

State of patient 2 years or longer after biopsy was taken

b

PD, MD, WD = poorly, moderately and well defined tumors