Table 3.

Multivariate Logistic Regression Analysis of Discordant Self-report of Hormone Receptor Status compared with the cancer registry

	Total (N=2191)*			Among women who reported positive or negative status (N=1618)†;
	OR	95% Cl	p-value	OR	95% Cl	p-value
Age at Diagnosis
41–50 vs. ≤40	1.18	0.79–1.76	0.425	0.78	0.40–1.52	0.466
51–64 vs. ≤40	1.61	1.10–2.37	0.015	1.09	0.59–2.03	0.787
Stage at Diagnosis
Regional vs. Local	1.00	0.81–1.24	0.979	1.15	0.76–1.74	0.509
Distant vs. Local	1.15	0.59–2.22	0.689	2.72	1.06–6.97	0.037
Unstaged/Unknown vs. Local	1.70	0.70–4.16	0.245	---
Education
High School vs. Higher education	2.60	2.11–3.21	<0.001	1.49	0.97–2.28	0.070
Race
Non-white vs. white	3.12	2.26–4.31	<0.001	2.55	1.38–4.69	0.003
Household Income
30–70K vs. >70K	1.31	1.02–1.68	0.032	0.85	0.54–1.32	0.459
<30K vs. >70K	2.89	2.18–3.82	<0.001	0.87	0.48–1.59	0.650
Hormone receptor status (registry)
ER/PR negative vs. positive	1.62	1.27–2.06	<0.001	2.66	1.76–4.02	<0.001

^*Discordant N=690 vs. Concordant N=1501

^†Excludes don’t know/missing self-report, Discordant N=117 vs. Concordant N=1501