Skip to main content
. 2013 Sep 11;4:248. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2013.00248

Table 1.

Echolocation and visual detection range for P. kuhlii.

Object/method Acoustic (m) Acoustic (m) Visual method 1(m) Visual method 2(m) Visual method 2(m)
(20 dB) (0 dB) 10 lux 5 lux
Moth (18 mm) 4 (3) 7 (5.5) 4.5 6 4
Ant (13 mm) 3.5 (2.5) 7 (5.5) 3.5 3.5 2.5
Lace wing (10 mm) 2.5 (1.5) 5 (4) 2.5 1.5 1
Mosquito (3.5 mm) 2 (1) 4 (3) 1 0.5 0.5
Artificial wing (3 mm) 2 (1) 4 (3)

Echolocation-based detection ranges are shown for four types of prey and one artificial small object. Ranges are shown for two alternative hearing sensitivities (0 or 20 dB SPL) and for either the peak or RMS (in brackets) emission levels. Visual detection range is presented for two different methods, (1) based on visual acuity and (2) based on photon flux. The second method is estimated for two different light levels (5, 10 lux). All ranges are given in meters.