Skip to main content
. 2013 Mar 4;76(3):320–328. doi: 10.1111/bcp.12105

Table 2.

Meta-analysis results

Fixed-effects model Random-effects model Tests of homogeneity Tests of publication bias
No. of studies RR (95% CI) RR (95% CI) Q value (d.f.) P value I2 Begg's P value Egger's P value
Any bisphosphonate use and colorectal cancer risk
All studies 6 0.80 (0.74, 0.85) 0.80 (0.71, 0.90) 13.00 (5) 0.023 61.6% 0.851 0.410
Case–control studies 4 0.86 (0.78, 0.94) 0.85 (0.75, 0.98) 5.69 (3) 0.128 47.3% 0.502 0.218
Cohort studies 2 0.70 (0.63, 0.79) 0.70 (0.63, 0.79) 0.30 (1) 0.583 0% NA NA
Duration of bisphosphonate use and colorectal cancer risk
Duration <1 year
  All studies 3 0.86 (0.76, 0.98) 0.86 (0.72, 1.04) 2.93 (2) 0.231 31.7% 0.602 0.633
  Case–control studies 2 0.88 (0.75, 1.03) 0.93 (0.78, 1.12) 0.59 (1) 0.59 31.7% NA NA
  Cohort studies 1 0.82 (0.64, 1.04) 0.74 (0.57, 0.94) NA NA NA NA NA
Duration ≥1 year
  All studies 4 0.82 (0.71, 0.94) 0.79 (0.56, 1.11) 17.33 (3) 0.001 82.7% 0.051 0.125
  Case–control studies 3 0.85 (0.72, 0.99) 0.81 (0.51, 1.28) 16.49 (2) 0.000 87.9% 0.174 0.001
  Cohort studies 1 0.72 (0.53, 0.98) 0.72 (0.52, 0.97) NA NA NA NA NA