Table 2.
Frequency of antimicrobial resistance patterns in Enterococcus sp. isolated from cloacal swabs of broilers feed with different dietary supplemented
| Resistance % to a | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Group | AMP | PEN | VAN | CIP | ST | RIF | CLO | NIT | TET | ERI |
| 1* | 0 | 67.7 | 0 | 0 | 3.3 | 23.3 | 0 | 0 | 56.7 | 50 |
| 2* | 0 | 40 | 10 | 6.6 | 3.3 | 33.3 | 0 | 0 | 100 | 6.6 |
| 3* | 0 | 56.7 | 3.3 | 16.6 | 16.6 | 60 | 0 | 0 | 100 | 53.3 |
| 4* | 0 | 60 | 6.6 | 3.3 | 46.7 | 26.7 | 13.3 | 0 | 90 | 70 |
| 5* | 0 | 33.3 | 3.3 | 0 | 43.3 | 20 | 0 | 6.6 | 100 | 53.3 |
| 6* | 0 | 33.3 | 0 | 6.6 | 13.3 | 20 | 6.6 | 3.3 | 87 | 26.7 |
| 7* | 0 | 50 | 6.6 | 0 | 23.3 | 63.3 | 3.3 | 0 | 93 | 53.3 |
| 8 | 0 | 30 | 3.3 | 6.6 | 6.6 | 56.7 | 0 | 3.3 | 97 | 10 |
a
Antibiotics: ampicillin (AMP), penicillin (PEN),vancomycin (VAN), ciprofloxacin (CIP), streptomycin (ST), rifampicin (RIF), chloramphenicol (CLO), nitrofurantoium (NIT), tetracycline (TET), erythromycin (ERI).
*
Broilers inoculated with Eimeria spp.