Skip to main content
. 2013 Sep;21(9):1290–1298. doi: 10.1016/j.joca.2013.05.007

Table IIb.

Results of network meta-analyses for comparisons with acupuncture: trials of any-quality

Intervention [abbreviations in brackets relate to Fig. 1(a–d)] No. of trials (No. of patients) SMD (95% Cr I) Difference expressed on a WOMAC VAS 0-100 pain scale (95% Cr I)
Acupuncture (comparator)
Interferential therapy (INT) 3 (98) −0.74 (−1.54 to 0.05) −12.21 (–25.33 to 0.84)
TENS (TENS) 12 (285) 0.24 (−0.22 to 0.70) 3.92 (–3.70 to 11.50)
PES (PES) 6 (180) 0.25 (−0.35 to 0.84) 4.04 (–5.78 to 13.87)
Balneotherapy (BAL) 9 (275) 0.29 (−0.22 to 0.81) 4.82 (–3.60 to 13.28)
Aerobic exercise (AE EX) 11 (428) 0.34 (−0.11 to 0.79) 5.67 (–1.84 to 13.00)
Tai Chi (TAI) 4 (159) 0.38 (−0.22 to 0.98) 6.30 (–3.58 to 16.12)
Static magnets (MAG) 2 (41) 0.39 (−0.48 to 1.25) 6.41 (–7.86 to 20.61)
Sham Acupuncture (SH ACU) 14 (892) 0.42 (0.15 to 0.70) 6.93 (2.50 to 11.46)
Manual therapy (MAN) 4 (166) 0.45 (−0.14 to 1.05) 7.47 (–2.30 to 17.23)
Muscle-strengthening exercise (MU EX) 28 (1254) 0.49 (0.15 to 0.84) 8.14 (2.41 to –13.83)
Ice/cooling treatment (ICE) 3 (51) 0.54 (−0.16 to 1.25) 8.88 (–2.70 to 20.61)
Heat treatment (HEA) 5 (123) 0.58 (−0.02 to 1.18) 9.55 (–0.30 to 19.44)
Laser therapy (LAS) 5 (155) 0.62 (−0.02 to 1.25) 10.16 (–0.28 to 20.61)
Weight loss (WEI) 5 (436) 0.63 (0.13 to 1.14) 10.44 (2.13 to 18.72)
PEMF (PEMF) 5 (238) 0.74 (0.13 to 1.36) 12.26 (2.22 to 22.36)
Placebo (PLA) 42 (1077) 0.82 (0.40 to 1.25) 13.53 (6.58 to 20.53)
Standard Care (SC) 53 (2308) 0.89 (0.59 to 1.18) 14.69 (9.80 to 19.52)
Braces (BRA) 1 (12) 0.89 (–0.51 to 2.31) 14.76 (–8.49 to 38.01)
Insoles (INS) 3 (197) 0.99 (0.21 to 1.78) 16.33 (3.41 to 29.30)
NMES (NMES) 2 (28) 1.11 (0.22 to 1.98) 18.27 (3.57 to 32.72)
No intervention (NO INT) 5 (87) 1.33 (0.69 to 1.97) 21.95 (11.30 to 32.52)
Data points: 131 Residual deviance: 152.
Between-study standard deviation: 0.45 (95% CI: 0.36–0.55).

see Table IId footnote.