Skip to main content
. 2013 Sep 14;19(34):5738–5749. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v19.i34.5738

Table 3.

Results obtained from sub-analyses based on plant type

Plant IBD type Study Patients reported AE
Clinical efficacy
Endoscopic efficacy
Histological efficacy
Recurrence relapse
Any AE Serious AE Clinical remission Clinical response Endoscopic remission Endoscopic response Histological remission Histological response
Aloe vera UC 16 0.70 (0.25-2.08) - 4.20 (0.84-24.84) 3.27 (1.06-12.13) 1.48 (0.44-5.84) 1.69 (0.69-5.04) 0.64 (0.25-1.81) 0.86 (0.55-1.55) -
Andrographis paniculata UC 17 0.94 (0.75-1.20) 1.01 (0.22-4.65) 1.41 (0.92-2.23) 1.32 (0.98-1.84) 1.32 (0.93-1.93) - - - -
Artemisia absinthium CD 18 - 1.00 (0.06-16.69) - 9.61 (0.73-126.15), P = 0.09 - - - - -
CD 19 - - 27.00 (3.23-260.81) - - - - -
Boswellia serrata CD 20 0.82 (0.66-1.04), P = 0.11 0.95 (0.27-3.31), P = 0.94 - - - - - - 0.95 (0.52-1.73)
Collagenous colitis 21 2.34 (1.02-6.07) - - - - - -
Triticum aestivum UC 22 - - - 2.18 (1.19-4.78) - - - - -

Results are expressed as relative risk (95%CI). AE: Adverse event; CD: Crohn’s disease; UC: Ulcerative colitis; IBD: Inflammatory bowel disease.