Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Sep 11.
Published in final edited form as: Behav Med. 2009 Winter;34(4):145–155. doi: 10.3200/BMED.34.4.145-155

TABLE 3.

CaD adherence at AV2 (1 Year Post-CaD Randomization), Initial Change Model

Effect Logistic regression model of CaD first-year adherence > 80%
p Odds ratio 95% Confidence limits
Sociodemographic variables
 Age group
  50–55 vs. 70–79 < .001 0.82 0.73–0.92
  55–60 vs. 70–79 .438 0.96 0.87–1.06
  60–65 vs. 70–79 .309 1.05 0.95–1.16
  65–70 vs. 70–79 .021 1.12 1.02–1.24
 Race or ethnicity
  African American vs. white < .001 0.62 0.55–0.70
  Hispanic vs. white .052 0.84 0.71–1.00
  Others or unknown vs. white .091 0.86 0.72–1.03
 College or higher vs. high school or less .084 1.06 0.99–1.12
 Had medical insurance
  Yes vs. no .019 1.18 1.03–1.35
 Married or with partner vs. divorced, separated, widowed, or single < .001 1.12 1.06–1.20
 Prior history of CVD
  Yes vs. no .349 0.96 0.89–1.04
 Prior history of cancer
  Yes vs. no .495 1.05 0.91–1.21
 Diabetes
  Yes vs. no .019 1.17 1.03–1.33
 High risk (≥ 4) of osteoporosis
  Yes vs. no .652 0.98 0.92–1.06
 Family history of breast cancer or colorectal cancer or MI
  Yes vs. no .298 1.03 0.97–1.10
 Shortened CES-D/DIS ≥ .06
  Yes vs. no .013 0.88 0.80–0.97
 Had > 3 life events
  Yes vs. no .162 0.95 0.89–1.02
 Emotion expressiveness > 3
  Yes vs. no .031 0.88 0.79–0.99
 Optimism ≥ 19
  Yes vs. no .825 1.01 0.91–1.13
 Hostility ≥ 8
  Yes vs. no .521 0.97 0.88–1.07
 On any special diet at baseline
  Yes vs. no .976 1.00 0.94–1.06
 Total expenditure from physical act ≥ 11
  Yes vs. no .024 1.07 1.01–1.14
 Current smoker vs. never or former smoker
  Yes vs. no < .001 0.77 0.69–0.86
 Current drinker vs. past or nondrinker
  Yes vs. no .06 0.94 0.88–1.00
 Take any supplement at AV1
  Yes vs. no < .001 1.24 1.16–1.33
 Taking any medication at AV1
  Yes vs. no .231 1.05 0.97–1.13
 Take calcium supplement at AV1
  Yes vs. no < .001 1.17 1.08–1.27
Psychosocial variables
 Social support ≥ 25
  Yes vs. no .81 0.99 0.89–1.10
 Social strain ≥ 5
  Yes vs. no .617 0.98 0.92–1.05
 Caregiving burden
  Yes vs. no .552 1.02 0.96–1.08
Treatment factors
 Total number of GI symptoms at baseline
  1 vs. none .003 0.89 0.82–0.96
  2 vs. none < .001 0.78 0.72–0.85
  3 vs. none < .001 0.76 0.68–0.84
 Had 4-week contact
  Yes vs. no < .001 1.37 1.27–1.48
 Contact type 6 months after CaD randomization
  Visit vs. phone or mail < .001 2.09 1.92–2.27
 CaD 1st-year pill type
  Chew vs. swallow < .001 0.72 0.67–0.77
  Mix vs. swallow < .001 0.49 0.45–0.53
 1st-year DM adherence
  Adherent in DM vs. not in DM .004 1.17 1.05–1.31
  Not adherent in DM vs. not in DM .707 1.02 0.93–1.11
 1st-year HT adherence
  < 80% vs. not in HT .06 0.87 0.75–1.01
  ≥ 80% vs. not in HT < .001 1.66 1.53–1.81
 Change clinic from CaD randomization to CaD1
  Yes vs. no .17 0.69 0.40–1.18

Note. Max-rescaled R2 = 0.11; AV1 = annual visit 1; C statistics = 0.670; Hosmer-Lemeshow goodnessof-fit test p = .3118. BMI = body mass index; CED-D/DIS = Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale; CaD = calcium and vitamin D clinical trial; CVD = cardiovascular disease; DM = dietary modification; HT = hormone treatment.