Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Mar 1.
Published in final edited form as: Clin Pract Pediatr Psychol. 2013 Mar 4;1(1):68–80. doi: 10.1037/cpp0000007

Table 1.

Descriptive Data at Baseline

TAU+UCanPoopToo
(n=47)
TAU
(n=43)
Significance
Gender 81% male 81% male FET, p = 1.00
Age 8.47 (1.92) 8.66 (1.72) t(1,88) = .51, p = .61
Race1 85% White 95% White FET, p = .16
High School degree or less (Parent) 53% 50%* FET, p = .83
Age of toilet training (months) 31.00 (12.17) 27.05 (17.01) t(1,75) = 1.26, p = .21
Accident history (months) 42.55 (30.79) 47.14 (33.73) t(1,88) = .67, p = .50
# of accidents per 2 weeks (median(range)) 8.00 (2-70) 9.00 (2-70) z =1.02, p=.31
# previous medical visits (median(range))2 3.00 (0-15)* 3.00 (0-35) z = .53, p = .60
# previous mental health visits (median(range))2 0.00 (0-120) 1.00 (0-24) z= 1.28, p = .20
“Very comfortable using Internet” (Parent)3 79% 81% FET, p = .80
Check email daily (Parent)4 68% 61% FET, p = .51

Note: FET = Fisher’s Exact Test

*

One case missing.

1

Race is coded as white vs. all other races.

2

% visits were related to encopresis

3

For comfort with the Internet, the percentage show represents those who selected “very comfortable” or “I’m an expert” as compared to those who selected “somewhat comfortable” or “comfortable.”

4

% who check email daily is compared to % who check email less than daily.