Skip to main content
. 2013 Sep 1;63(3):339–346. doi: 10.1270/jsbbs.63.339

Table 2.

Putative QTLs for WBK and DTH in RILs population

Traits QTL Chr Nearest marker 2006 (F7) 2008 (F8)


LOD AEa r2 b Thresholdc LOD AE r2 Threshold
WBK qWB3 3 RM4383 5.18 −3.11 10.6 3.26 3.34
qWB4 4 RM3288 4.30 −2.42 6.5
qWB6 6 RM8125 18.11 −5.40 31.5 21.70 −8.13 36.8
qWB9 9 RM2482 7.63 4.35 10.7
KW qKW3-1 3 RM7365 4.56 −0.26 8.9 3.54 3.82 −0.23 7.4 3.37
qKW3-2 3 RM3513 4.53 −0.21 5.9
qKW6 6 RM5314 3.76 0.20 6.0
qKW7 7 RM505 3.53 0.21 6.6
qKW10 10 RM2371 5.09 0.23 7.9
DTH qDH1 1 RM151 4.54 5.08 −0.22 19.1 3.76
qDH3 3 RM5172 4.98 −0.53 11.7
qDH6 6 RM1369 5.30 0.68 8.4 8.22 0.54 12.1

WBK, white-back kernels; KW, 1,000 kernel weight; DTH, days-to-heading.

a

Additive effect of the HE allele.

b

Percentage of total phenotypic variance explained by the QTL.

c

Significant threshold LOD value (P 0.05) determined from 1000 permutations.