Table 4. Number and duration of contacts of HCWs (NURs and MEDs) with patients.
RFID tag number and role class | Number of distinct patients contacted | Cumulative number of contacts with patients | Cumulative duration of contacts with patients | |||||
Number | %* | Number | %** | Cumulative %** | Duration | %** | Cumulative %** | |
Average HCW | 13 | 44.8% | 93 | 2.6% | – | 4377 | 2.6% | – |
Average MED | 9 | 31% | 52 | 1.5% | – | 2675 | 1.6% | – |
Average NUR | 15 | 51.7% | 109 | 3.1% | – | 5070 | 3% | – |
1115 (NUR) | 24 | 82.8% | 294 | 8.3% | 8.3% | 17040 | 10.2% | 10.2% |
1295 (NUR) | 20 | 69.0% | 291 | 8.3% | 16.6% | 13580 | 8.2% | 18.4% |
1207 (NUR) | 20 | 69.0% | 252 | 7.1% | 23.7% | 12500 | 7.5% | 25.9% |
1210 (NUR) | 22 | 75.9% | 245 | 7.0% | 30.7% | 11540 | 6.9% | 32.9% |
1181 (NUR) | 11 | 37.9% | 221 | 6.3% | 37.0% | 10080 | 6.1% | 38.9% |
1193 (NUR) | 21 | 72.4% | 180 | 5.1% | 42.1% | 9020 | 5.4% | 44.3% |
Other HCWs | 22 | 75.9% | 139 | 57.9% | 100.0% | 5080 | 55.7% | 100.0% |
We show the average of these quantities over all HCWs, all NURs and all MEDs as well as the values for the six HCWs with most contacts.
Calculated over the total number of patients in the study, n = 29.
Calculated over the cumulative number and duration of contacts with patients in the study.