Table 3.
Feature | All reviewed apps | Downloaded apps | Significance |
---|---|---|---|
Developer type | N (%) | N (%) | |
Individual | 27 (11.9 %) | 0 (0 %) | p = .513 |
Health industry | 23 (10.1 %) | 4 (17.4 %) | |
Website | 1 (0.4 %) | 0 (0 %) | |
General developer | 92 (40.5 %) | 8 (34.8 %) | |
Health developer | 71 (31.3 %) | 10 (43.5 %) | |
Non-profit, education, or government | 13 (5.7 %) | 1 (4.3 %) | |
Ratings | Mean (SD) | Mean (SD) | |
Most recent | 3.2 (1.07) | 3.3 (1.07) | p = .734 |
Overall | 3.1 (1.04) | 3.2 (1.0) | p = .880 |
Price | Median (range) | Median (range) | |
US$ | 0.99 (0–24.99) | 1.99 (0–4.99) | p = .976 |
Number of reviews | |||
Most recent | 13 (5–1,525) | 14 (7–1,214) | p = .161 |
Overall | 19 (5–4,500) | 14 (7–4,500) | p = .056 |