Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Sep 12.
Published in final edited form as: J Urol. 2013 Mar 14;190(3):1102–1109. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2013.02.3229

Figure 3. Stool weight and % fat absorption.

Figure 3

A) Stool weight was highest in RYGB animals on 40% fat diet compared to all other groups. Even on normal fat, RYGB animals had significantly heavier stools than sham aged-matched controls. B) Control animals consistently maintained higher % fat absorption than RYGB animals whereas RYGB animals absorbed less % fat on high fat diet. Oxalate content did not affect % fat absorption. Data are shown as mean values ± SEM. * - p<0.05 within group; † - p<0.05 compared to sham, age-matched controls.