Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Aug 1.
Published in final edited form as: Curr Opin Chem Biol. 2013 Jul 19;17(4):682–690. doi: 10.1016/j.cbpa.2013.05.031

Photoswitchable Fluorescent Proteins: Ten Years of Colorful Chemistry and Exciting Applications

Xin X Zhou 1, Michael Z Lin 1
PMCID: PMC3771498  NIHMSID: NIHMS492226  PMID: 23876529

Abstract

Reversibly photoswitchable fluorescent proteins (RSFPs) are fluorescent proteins whose fluorescence, upon excitation at a certain wavelength, can be switched on or off by light in a reversible manner. In the last ten years, many new RSFPs have been developed and novel applications in cell imaging discovered that rely on their photoswitching properties. This review will describe research on the mechanisms of reversible photoswitching and recent applications using RSFPs. While cis-trans isomerization of the chromophore is believed to be the general mechanism for most RSFPs, structural studies reveal diversity in the details of photoswitching mechanisms, including different effects of protonation, chromophore planarity, and pocket flexibility. Applications of RSFPs include new types of live-cell superresolution imaging, tracking of protein movements and interactions, information storage, and optical control of protein activity.


Recent years considerable attention has been paid to phototransformable fluorescent proteins (FPs) because of their exciting new applications in superresolution fluorescence microscopy techniques[1, 2]. Phototransformable FPs can be categorized into three types — photoactivating, photoconverting, and photoswitching — based on their responses to light. In contrast to photoactivation and photoconversion, which result from irreversible light-induced covalent modification of chromophore structures, photoswitching results from reversible conformational changes that allow the chromophore to switch between “on” and “off” states [3]. Because of their ability to undergo repeated cycles of activation and deactivation, reversibly photoswitchable FPs have found unique utility in superresolution time-lapse microscopy in living cells. They have also been the subject of intense structural study to understand how alternate chromophore states exist and interconvert within a single protein. Finally, recent FP engineering efforts have succeeded in adjusting multiple performance parameters of photoswitchable FPs to improve their utility in biological experiments. This review will provide a summary of our understanding of photoswitchable FPs, describing recent findings on their basic switching mechanisms and summarizing their applications.

Basic characteristics of photoswitchable FPs

Several engineered mutants of the first FP cloned, the green fluorescent protein from Aequoria victoria, were known to exhibit switching properties in a portion of the protein population, such as YFP [4], CFP [5], EYFP [5], Citrine [5], E2GFP [6], and YFP-10C [7]. However, these proteins generate limited contrast before and after light switching, preventing them from being widely utilized as photoswitchable highlighters. In 2003, the first efficiently photoswitchable FP, kindling fluorescent protein (KFP), was evolved from asFP59 and shown to be capable of precise in vivo photolabeling to track movements of proteins [8]. However, the tetrameric nature of asFP595 and its variants limited their practical use.

In the following year, Dronpa [9], a monomeric green photoswitchable FP, was engineered from a tetrameric Pectiniidae coral FP. Several mutants, PDM1-4 [10], Dronpa-2 [11], Dronpa-3 [11], rsFastLime [12], and bsDronpa [13], were evolved from Dronpa and show different photoswitching kinetics. These photoswitchable FPs show a baseline “on” state that can be switched “off” by light. Padron [13], another Dronpa mutant, is a photoswitchable FP that displays the opposite behavior of being “off” at baseline and switching to “on” upon illumination. In recent years, Mut2Q[14], EYQ1 [14], rsEGFP [15] and mGeos [16] were reported to display different switching speed, faster maturation, better stability, or higher localization precision potential, serving as potential candidates to replace Dronpa in various biological applications. Furthermore, to expand the spectra window from GFPs, cyan-emitting mTFP0.7 [17] and several improved red photoswitchable FPs — rsCherry [18], rsCherryRev [18], rsTagRFP [19] and mApple [20] — were also generated.

Two other type of engineered photoswitchable FPs are more complex in exhibiting other phototransforming properties in addition to photoswitching. One type comprises FPs that integrate both reversible photoswitching between on/off state and irreversible photoconversion from a green- to a red-emitting form. This type includes IrisFPs [21, 22] and NijiFP [23]. Their multiple phototranformation modes enable novel applications such as two-color nanoscopy and sequential photoactivation schemes. The second type is represented by a single YFP called Dreiklang [24], which excites at 515 nm but switches at 405 and 365 nm. In most photoswitchable FPs, illumination at the wavelength for fluorescence excitation can also photoswitch the protein. Dreiklang is a unique photoswitchable FP in that its fluorescence excitation spectrum is decoupled from that for optical switching. This feature allows fine-tuning of the duration of the chromophore states without interference by the fluorescence excitation light.

Mechanism of photoswitching

General Mechanism: Cis-trans Isomerization

Photoswitchable FPs adopt a classic 11-strand beta-barrel FP structure that encloses an autocatalytically generated 4-(p-hydroxybenzylidene)-5-imidazolinone (p-HBI) chromophore. Structural studies of simple photoswitchable FPs indicate that cis-trans isomerization of the chromophore methylene bridge between the two rings of the chromophore can account for the photoswitching mechanism (Fig.1). In the cases that have been studied so far, for FPs that switch completely from on to off, the chromophore adopts the cis rotamer in the resting state (Fig. 1A), while FPs exhibiting off-on switching adopt the trans rotamer at rest (Fig. 1B). Stabilizing interactions between chromophore and the surrounding residues determine their resting states, e.g. in Dronpa, the strong hydrogen bonding interaction between Ser142 and the hydroxybenzylidene moiety stabilize its cis conformation, making Dronpa an on-off switch, while a single mutation Met159Tyr, as found in Padron, reverses the switching direction, because a hydrogen bond between Tyr159 and the p-hydroxyphenyl ring stabilizes the trans rotamer of the chromophore.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Photoswitching involves cis-trans isomerization in Dronpa (A) and trans-cis isomerization in Padron (B).

The consistent association of cis and trans chromophore rotamers with bright and dark states observed in all FPs characterized as photoswitching is not due to inherent properties of cis and trans chromophores. Indeed, there are FPs that exhibit brighter fluorescence in the trans than the cis conformation [25, 26], and that transition between the two conformations upon illumination [27]. Thus these FPs could be considered as partial photoswitchable FPs that operate in the opposite direction with respect to chromophore conformation. This emphasizes that attributes other than the chromophore rotamer, such as modulation of absorbance spectra by chromophore protonation or modulation of quantum yield by chromophore flexibility, determine the relative brightness of the two rotamers.

Chromophore protonation occurs in the off state of many photoswitchable FPs, leading to a blue-shift of the absorbance peak. This leads to a drop of absorption at the previous absorption wavelength and therefore an effective loss of fluorescence excitability. However, the blue-shifted protonated chromophore is also not fluorescent, so in these proteins additional differences in the flexibility of the chromophore in the bright and dark states must account for the dimming. Increases in chromophore torsion upon excitation, which have been predicted by molecular dynamics studies [28, 29] are expected to decrease quantum yield regardless of spectral tuning. In Padron, these protonation-independent mechanisms appear to be the primary reason for the dimness of the basal state, as the chromophore is primarily deprotonated in both states, and a change in relative degree of protonation does not affect photoswitching [30, 31]. Nevertheless, given the association of protonation with isomerization in most photoswitchable FPs, studies have addressed whether the two events are causally related with inconsistent results. In one study, isomerization was proposed to follow protonation [32], while in another, isomerization was believed to be the leading process [33]. Two other studies suggested a concerted process {[14].

An Alternative View: Contribution from the Beta Barrel

In some on-off photoswitchable FPs, isomerization is accompanied by substantial conformational change of the chromophore pocket [17, 21, 34]. In these cases, side chains that sterically affect the isomerization process influence the switching capability and switching speed of a given FP. For example, in Dronpa, Val157 and Met159 hinder the isomerization of the chromophore. Accordingly, Dronpa-2 (Met159Thr) and Dronpa-3 (Val157Ile, Met159Ala) exhibit faster off-switching kinetics [11]. However, in the off-on photoswitching FP Padron, conformational rearrangements of the chromophore pocket are more subtle [30]. Indeed, Padron photoswitching is as efficient at 100K, a temperature at which protein dynamical breathing is negligible, as at room temperature, implying the chromophore pocket does not substantially hinder photoswitching [30].

In an alternative view of Dronpa photoswitching, it was proposed that switching involves not only the formation of a trans conformer but also a dramatic increase in flexibility of the chromophore and the chromphore pocket (Fig. 2). Mizuno et al. observed that a putative hydrogen-bond-donating serine residue located in the beta-barrel wall was required for a bright on-state, and that the wall of the beta-barrel structure near the chromophore becomes flexible in the off state, as detected by NMR [32]. The authors proposed that, instead of cis-trans isomerization driving protonation and an absorbance shift of the chromophore, protonation of the chromophore (through an unspecified process) first removes a hydrogen-bonding interaction with Ser142 in the beta-barrel wall, leading to local beta-barrel unfolding and then chromophore flexibility that lowers quantum yield.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Conformational changes during Dronpa photoswitching at room temperature.

However, the Reversible Photoswitching in Fluorescent Proteinshe necessity of the beta barrel flexibility for loss of fluorescence was challenged by experiments showing that crystals in the off-state were as dim at at ~170K as at room temperature [31]. If motion in the beta barrel were required for complete off-switching via quantum yield suppression, the off-state protein would be expected to be brighter at low temperatures, where motion is reduced, compared to room temperature, but this was not observed [31]. A mechanistic model that could account for all these observations could be that photoinduced cis-trans isomerization and loss of the hydrogen bond with Ser142 occurs together. At room temperature, this leads to beta-barrel disorder and then chromophore conformational flexibility, as was observed by NMR. The chromophore becomes protonated due to the loss of stabilization of the anionic state by the hydrogen bond from Ser142. At low temperatures, the beta barrel may be essentially well ordered, and the chromophore may also be confined to a more restricted set of trans conformations. However, the chromophore could still become protonated from the loss of stabilization of the anionic state, and there may still be enough chromophore motion in the trans conformation to render it non-fluorescent. Regardless, some transient expansion or “breathing” of the barrel may be required for off-switching, as viscosity in the surrounding environment [35] and Dronpa oligomerization [10] result in slower kinetics of Dronpa off-photoswitching.

A Different Switching Mechanism – Reversible Hydration/Dehydration in Dreiklang

A unique photoswitchable FP, Dreiklang [24], utilizes a completely different switching mechanism. Instead of cis-trans isomerization, the chromophore of Dreiklang undergoes a reversible hydration/dehydration reaction on a carbon atom in the imidazolinone ring (Fig.3). The hydration shortens the chromophoric π -electron system and makes the absorption wavelengths further blue-shifted. This new switching mechanism uniquely decouples the wavelengths used for photoswitching and for excitation for fluorescence detection in Dreiklang: Peak wavelengths for reversible on- and off- switching are at ~365 nm and ~405 nm, whereas the fluorescence excitation spectrum peaks at ~488 nm with emission peaking at ~515 nm. Residues Y203, E222 and chromophore residue G65 were shown to be crucial for this reaction. A similar reversible hydration reaction was postulated to occur during the chromophore formation of GFP. We anticipate that with more engineering work, more photoswitchable FPs with decoupled switching and excitation wavelengths like Dreiklang could be generated, allowing for useful biological applications.

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Conformational changes in Dreiklang photoswitching.

Applications

Tracking Protein Movement and Interactions

Since their discovery, FPs have been extensively used to highlight protein of interest in living cells. However, it is difficult to track protein movement with non-transformable FPs since the labeled proteins would be evenly distributed in cells. Fluorescence recovery after photobleaching (FRAP) and optical activations of FPs are the two strategies to highlight select region of molecules and track their movements [36]. However, these methods are limited by their irreversible nature. Optical highlighting of Photoswitching FPs enables the reversible labeling of specific molecules and thus enables the repeated measurements of protein behavior and the erasing of information after each measurement, thus allowing the identification of responses in one cell under different stimulus. Given these advantageous features, Photoswitching FPs have been widely used for tracking protein dynamics in cells, e.g. the observation of Erk translocation in and out of nucleus with and w/o EGF [9].

Another well known strategy using FPs is Förster resonance energy transfer (FRET), a popular technique to monitor protein interactions and conformational changes [37]. In this technique, FRET pair of cyan/yellow or green/red FPs are fused to two individual proteins to report their intermolecular interaction, or fused to one protein to flank its domain of interest and monitor its conformational change. Traditionally, photostable FPs would be preferable for FRET to guarantee reliable and consistent readouts. Recent years, with the report of the first red RSFP, rsTagRFP, photochromic FRET (pcFRET) method was proposed and demonstrated to show robust performance [19]. In this technique, the quantification of FRET efficiency is based on the measurements of donor fluorescence before and after light switching. Before photoswitching, there is a large overlap between donor emission and acceptor absorbance spectra, whereas after photoswitching, the donor emission and acceptor absorbance have small or no overlap. This internal change of the FRET pair allows accurate and repeated FRET quantification for the same FRET pair within the same live cell without the need for corrections based on reference images acquired from separate control cells.

Superresolution Imaging

The observation of molecular events by traditional fluorescence imaging microscopy is hampered by the diffraction of light. Superresolution techniques can provide protein information that beyond diffraction limit, serving as powerful tools for elucidating detailed molecular behaviors. Photoswitchable FPs are optimal fluorescent tags for superresolution imaging. It allows genetically labeling and repeatable data reading of target proteins. Here we briefly summarize the principles of three superresolution imaging techniques that use photoswitchable FPs as labels.

The first technique is patterned illumination-based superresolution, specifically reversible optically-linear fluorescence transitions (RESOLFT) [15, 38, 39]. RESOLFT is evolved from stimulated emission depletion (STED) [40]. In RESOLFT, the protein of interest is labeled with Photoswitchable FPs, and the sample is illuminated in a pattern that shapes like a doughnut and the intensity of light being small at one position. Only at this position, the molecules are not in the dark state and contribute to the detected signal. This region can be controlled to be smaller than the diffraction limit by increasing intensity of the transition light. The whole sample will be scanned to reconstruct the high-resolution image.

The second technique is single-molecule-based superresolution reconstruction, specifically photoactivation-localization microscopy (PALM) and its variants [15, 38]. This set of methods is based on sequential activation of fluorescent probes. During imaging, only a small number of molecules will be highlighted while the majority remains in the dark. The number of highlighted molecules is optically resolvable in the sense that the imaged pixels can be interpreted as Gaussian distributions, and the pixel with the highest intensity would be located as the center of the corresponding molecule and form the “located” molecule image. After each data collection, the fluorescent probes are subsequently deactivated and another subset of molecules is activated and imaged.

The third technique is photochromic stochastic optical fluctuation imaging (pcSOFI) [41]. pcSOFI was evolved form stochastic optical fluctuation imaging using small chemical dyes (SOFI) [42]. In this method, an on-photoswitching FP is irradiated, which would produce robust single-molecule intensity fluctuations, from which a superresolution picture can be extracted by a statistical analysis of the fluctuations in each pixel as a function of time. Compared to the previous two methods, pcSOFI does not use specialized equipment and adopts simple and rapid data acquisition, serving as a widely accessible method for superresolution fluorescence imaging of living systems.

Sensor of Subcellular Environment and Optical Protein Controller: Applications Based on Beta-Barrel Flexibility

The occurrence of conformational changes in the side chains of beta-barrel residues forming the chromophore pocket during photoswitching implies that manipulations that increase flexibility of the beta-barrel could accelerate photoswitching. Indeed, the off-photoswitching speed of Dronpa and several of its variants decreases as the viscosity of the surrounding solvent increases, presumably because viscosity inhibits beta-barrel structural fluctuations required for photoswitching. Dronpa-3, a structurally more flexible mutant that exhibits robust viscosity dependence, was used as a genetically encoded microenvironment probe to determine the differences in viscosities of different subcellular compartments [35].

Another application is to develop a protein-activity actuator using Dronpa mutants [43]. With off-photoswitching, beta strand 7 near the chromophore becomes flexible. This strand forms part of the cross-dimer interface in the tetrameric parent, and so it is reasonable to expect that off-photoswitching could affect the capability of Dronpa to oligomerize. Indeed, in the dark, Dronpa Lys145Asn is tetrameric, whereas cyan illumination induced redistribution from tetrameric toward monomeric species. Based on this light-dependent interaction, a fluorescent light-inducible protein (FLiPs) design was created, in which Dronpa Lys145Asn domain is fused to both termini of an enzyme of interest, where the termini straddle the enzyme active site. In the dark, the Dronpa Lys145Asn domains tetramerize and cage the protein, but light induces Dronpa Lys145Asn dissociation and activates the protein. Thus Dronpa domains can function in reversible optical control of protein activities, a type of function which had previously been assumed to exist in only other types of chromophore-containing proteins. Conveniently, the photoswitchable fluorescence of Dronpa serves as a built-in read-out of the activity state of the target protein. It remains to be determined whether other photoswitchable FPs can also function as optical control elements.

Future Applications in Data Writing and Storage

A potentially useful application of photoswitchable FPs is optical data writing and storage. Unlike photoconvertible proteins, which can create red fluorescent patterns irreversibly created by light, photoswitchable FPs allow for multiple writing cycles [44]. 2D data writing has been performed with Dronpa and IrisFP coated on a surface, and 3D data writing in crystals of IrisFP and other EosFP mutants [27, 45]. Compared to other optical encoding schemes such as encoding on silver zeolite microcarriers, [46], photoswitchable FPs are not as stable, and physical separation is needed to create pixels or voxels. However, they may be of utility in situations where instability or biodegradability is desirable.

Summary

In the 10 years since the invention of KFP and Dronpa, photoswitchable FPs have found unique uses in the imaging of protein movements and in nanometer-scale precision localization of proteins. Just recently, a photoswitchable FP has been found to be capable of mediating control of protein activity with light, potentially expanding the uses of FPs from optical imaging to optical control. As a class of primarily artificial proteins, photoswitchable FPs continue to be the subject of protein engineering efforts as well as biophysical study to understand their unique structure and behavior. Without a doubt, the next decade will see more creative engineering and utilization of these capriciously colorful proteins.

Supplementary Material

01
02
03
04
05
06

Highlights.

  • !!

    Photoswitchable fluorescent proteins cycle between on and off states in response to light.

  • !!

    Structural studies reveal diversity in the details of photoswitching mechanisms.

  • !!

    These proteins are extensively used for protein tracking and superresolution imaging.

  • !!

    Newer uses include information storage and optical control of protein activity.

Figure 4.

Figure 4

(A) Use of Dronpa-3 as a viscosity sensor. (B) A fluorescent light-inducible protein design based on Dronpa Lys145Asn.

Table 1. Well-characterized Photoswitchable FPs.

Direction and
Oligomerization
λmax
 ex/em
(nm)
ε
(M−1
cm−1)
! Brightness
relative to
EGFP
pKa λon/off and
λoff/on
(nm/nm)
mTFP0.7 [17] on–off (M) 453/488 60,000 0.50 0.89 4.0 458/405
Dronpa [9] on–off (M) 503/517 94,100 0.67 1.88 5.3 488/405
PDM1-4 [10] on–off (T) 503/517 ND ND ND ND 488/405
Dronpa-2 [11] on–off (M) 489/515 56,000 0.28 0.47 ND 488/405
Dronpa-3 [11] on–off (M) 489/515 58,000 0.33 0.57 ND 488/405
rsFastLime [12] on–off (M) 496/518 39,094 0.77 0.89 ND 488/405
bsDronpa [13] on–off (M) 460/504 45,000 0.50 0.67 ND 488/405
Padron [13] off–on (Mc) 503
(396)
/522
43,000 0.64 0.82 ND 405/488
Padron* [13] off–on (M) 503
(395)
/519
58,000 0.62 1.07 ND 405/488
Mut2Q [14] on–off (M) 496/507 54,000 0.28 0.45 6.0 478/405
rsEGFP [15] on–off (M) 493/510 47,000 0.36 0.50 6.5 488/405
mGeos-F [16] on–off (M) 504/515 53,135 0.85 1.33 5 488/405
mGeos-F [16] on–off (M) 503/514 51,609 0.85 1.29 4.55-
5
488/405
mGeos-F [16] on–off (M) 505/516 76,967 0.81 1.84 6 488/405
mGeos-F [16] on–off (M) 501/512 64,602 0.76 1.44 5-
5.5
488/405
mGeos-F [16] on–off (M) 501/513 69,630 0.75 1.54 6-
6.5
488/405
mGeos-F [16] on–off (M) 501/513 53,448 0.72 1.13 5-
5.5
488/405
EYQ1 [14] on–off (M) 510/524 73,000 0.72 1.56 6.9 514/405
asFP595 [47] off–on (T) 572/595 56,200 <0.001 <0.002 ND 450/569
KFP1 [8] off–on (T) 590/600 59,000 0.07 0.12 ND 458/532
rsCherry [18] off–on (M) 572/610 80,000 0.02 0.05 6.0 450/550
rsCherryRev [18] on–off (M) 572/608 84,000 0.005 0.01 5.5 550/450
rsTagRFP [19] on–off (M) 567/585 36,800 0.11 0.12 6.6 570/445
mApple [20] on–off (M) 568/592 75,000 0.49 1.10 6.5 570/480
IrisFP [21] on–off (T) 488/516 57,800 0.48 0.83 5.7 488
IrisFP [21] on–off (T) 551/580 27,000 0.50 0.40 6.8 561/440
mIrisFP [22] on–off (M) 486/516 74,000 0.60 1.32 5.7 488/405
mIrisFP [22] on–off (M) 546/578 26,000 0.44 0.34 7.0 561/440
NijiFP [23] on–off (M) 469/507 41,100 0.64 0.78 7.0 488/405
NijiFP [23] on–off (M) 469/507 41,100 0.64 0.78 7.0 488/405
Dreiklang [24] on–off (M) 511/529 83,000 0.41 1.01 7.2 405/365
a

λmax ex/em, maximum of excitation/emission spectrum; ε , molar extinction coefficient; !, fluorescence quantum yield; Brightness is the product of quantum yield and molar extinction coefficient expressed of the EGFP brightness.! λon/offand λoff/on, wavelengths required for efficient reversible transitions.

c

M, monomer; T, tetramer; ND, not determined.

d

15% dimer at 4°C

Acknowledgements

XXZ is supported by a Stanford Graduate Fellowship. MZL is supported by NIH grant 1R01NS076860-01, the Rita Allen Foundation, and the Burroughs Wellcome Foundation

Footnotes

Publisher's Disclaimer: This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final citable form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.

References

  • 1.Betzig E, Patterson GH, Sougrat R, Lindwasser OW, Olenych S, Bonifacino JS, Davidson MW, Lippincott-Schwartz J, Hess HF. Imaging intracellular fluorescent proteins at nanometer resolution. Science. 2006;313:1642–1645. doi: 10.1126/science.1127344. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Hess ST, Girirajan TP, Mason MD. Ultra-high resolution imaging by fluorescence photoactivation localization microscopy. Biophys J. 2006;91:4258–4272. doi: 10.1529/biophysj.106.091116. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3**.Bourgeois D, Adam V. Reversible photoswitching in fluorescent proteins: a mechanistic view. IUBMB Life. 2012;64:482–491. doi: 10.1002/iub.1023. This review provides a detailed description of the photoswitching mechanisms in fluorescent proteins.
  • 4.Dickson RM, Cubitt AB, Tsien RY, Moerner WE. On/off blinking and switching behaviour of single molecules of green fluorescent protein. Nature. 1997;388:355–358. doi: 10.1038/41048. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Sinnecker D, Voigt P, Hellwig N, Schaefer M. Reversible photobleaching of enhanced green fluorescent proteins. Biochemistry. 2005;44:7085–7094. doi: 10.1021/bi047881x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Nifosì R, Ferrari A, Arcangeli C, Tozzini V, Pellegrini V, Beltram F. Photoreversible dark state in a tristable green fluorescent protein variant. The Journal of Physical Chemistry B. 2003;107:1679–1684. [Google Scholar]
  • 7.McAnaney TB, Zeng W, Doe CFE, Bhanji N, Wakelin S, Pearson DS, Abbyad P, Shi X, Boxer SG, Bagshaw CR. Protonation, photobleaching, and photoactivation of yellow fluorescent protein (YFP 10C): a unifying mechanism. Biochemistry. 2005;44:5510–5524. doi: 10.1021/bi047581f. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Chudakov DM, Belousov VV, Zaraisky AG, Novoselov VV, Staroverov DB, Zorov DB, Lukyanov S, Lukyanov KA. Kindling fluorescent proteins for precise in vivo photolabeling. Nature biotechnology. 2003;21:191–194. doi: 10.1038/nbt778. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Ando R, Mizuno H, Miyawaki A. Regulated fast nucleocytoplasmic shuttling observed by reversible protein highlighting. Science. 2004;306:1370–1373. doi: 10.1126/science.1102506. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Mizuno H, Dedecker P, Ando R, Fukano T, Hofkens J, Miyawaki A. Higher resolution in localization microscopy by slower switching of a photochromic protein. Photochemical & photobiological sciences. 2010;9:239–248. doi: 10.1039/b9pp00124g. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Ando R, Flors C, Mizuno H, Hofkens J, Miyawaki A. Highlighted generation of fluorescence signals using simultaneous two-color irradiation on Dronpa mutants. Biophys J. 2007;92:L97–9. doi: 10.1529/biophysj.107.105882. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Stiel AC, Trowitzsch S, Weber G, Andresen M, Eggeling C, Hell SW, Jakobs S, Wahl MC. 1.8 A bright-state structure of the reversibly switchable fluorescent protein Dronpa guides the generation of fast switching variants. Biochem J. 2007;402:35–42. doi: 10.1042/BJ20061401. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Andresen M, Stiel AC, Folling J, Wenzel D, Schonle A, Egner A, Eggeling C, Hell SW, Jakobs S. Photoswitchable fluorescent proteins enable monochromatic multilabel imaging and dual color fluorescence nanoscopy. Nat Biotechnol. 2008;26:1035–1040. doi: 10.1038/nbt.1493. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Bizzarri R, Serresi M, Cardarelli F, Abbruzzetti S, Campanini B, Viappiani C, Beltram F. Single amino acid replacement makes Aequorea victoria fluorescent proteins reversibly photoswitchable. Journal of the American Chemical Society. 2009;132:85–95. doi: 10.1021/ja9014953. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Grotjohann T, Testa I, Leutenegger M, Bock H, Urban NT, Lavoie-Cardinal F, Willig KI, Eggeling C, Jakobs S, Hell SW. Diffraction-unlimited all-optical imaging and writing with a photochromic GFP. Nature. 2011;478:204–208. doi: 10.1038/nature10497. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16*.Chang H, Zhang M, Ji W, Chen J, Zhang Y, Liu B, Lu J, Zhang J, Xu P, Xu T. A unique series of reversibly switchable fluorescent proteins with beneficial properties for various applications. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2012;109:4455–4460. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1113770109. A new series of reversibly switchable green fluorescent proteins called mGeos are reported in this paper. mGeos display different photoswitching rates, photon outputs, photostabilities, and acid sensitivities, serving as potential candidates to replace Dronpa in various biological applications.
  • 17.Henderson JN, Ai H, Campbell RE, Remington SJ. Structural basis for reversible photobleaching of a green fluorescent protein homologue. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2007;104:6672–6677. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0700059104. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Stiel AC, Andresen M, Bock H, Hilbert M, Schilde J, Schonle A, Eggeling C, Egner A, Hell SW, Jakobs S. Generation of monomeric reversibly switchable red fluorescent proteins for far-field fluorescence nanoscopy. Biophys J. 2008;95:2989–2997. doi: 10.1529/biophysj.108.130146. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Subach FV, Zhang L, Gadella TW, Gurskaya NG, Lukyanov KA, Verkhusha VV. Red fluorescent protein with reversibly photoswitchable absorbance for photochromic FRET. Chem Biol. 2010;17:745–755. doi: 10.1016/j.chembiol.2010.05.022. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Shaner NC, Lin MZ, McKeown MR, Steinbach PA, Hazelwood KL, Davidson MW, Tsien RY. Improving the photostability of bright monomeric orange and red fluorescent proteins. Nat Methods. 2008;5:545–551. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.1209. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Adam V, Lelimousin M, Boehme S, Desfonds G, Nienhaus K, Field MJ, Wiedenmann J, McSweeney S, Nienhaus GU, Bourgeois D. Structural characterization of IrisFP, an optical highlighter undergoing multiple photo-induced transformations. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008;105:18343–18348. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0805949105. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Fuchs J, Bohme S, Oswald F, Hedde PN, Krause M, Wiedenmann J, Nienhaus GU. A photoactivatable marker protein for pulse-chase imaging with superresolution. Nat Methods. 2010;7:627–630. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.1477. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Adam V, Moeyaert B, David CC, Mizuno H, Lelimousin M, Dedecker P, Ando R, Miyawaki A, Michiels J, Engelborghs Y. Rational design of photoconvertible and biphotochromic fluorescent proteins for advanced microscopy applications. Chemistry & biology. 2011;18:1241–1251. doi: 10.1016/j.chembiol.2011.08.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24*.Brakemann T, Stiel AC, Weber G, Andresen M, Testa I, Grotjohann T, Leutenegger M, Plessmann U, Urlaub H, Eggeling C, et al. A reversibly photoswitchable GFP-like protein with fluorescence excitation decoupled from switching. Nat Biotechnol. 2011;29:942–947. doi: 10.1038/nbt.1952. A new photoswitchable fluorescent protein Dreiklang adopts a unique photoswitching mechanism and shows fluorescence excitation decoupled from switching. This novel feature allows fine-tuning of the duration of the chromophore states without interference by the fluorescence excitation light.
  • 25.Violot S, Carpentier P, Blanchoin L, Bourgeois D. Reverse pH-dependence of chromophore protonation explains the large Stokes shift of the red fluorescent protein mKeima. Journal of the American Chemical Society. 2009;131:10356–10357. doi: 10.1021/ja903695n. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Petersen J, Wilmann PG, Beddoe T, Oakley AJ, Devenish RJ, Prescott M, Rossjohn J. The 2.0-Å crystal structure of eqFP611, a far red fluorescent protein from the sea anemone Entacmaea quadricolor. Journal of Biological Chemistry. 2003;278:44626–44631. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M307896200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Nienhaus GU, Nienhaus K, Hölzle… A. Photoconvertible fluorescent protein EosFP: biophysical properties and cell biology applications. Photochemistry and …. 2007 doi: 10.1562/2005-05-19-RA-533. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Andresen M, Wahl MC, Stiel AC, Gräter F, Schäfer LV, Trowitzsch S, Weber G, Eggeling C, Grubmüller H, Hell SW. Structure and mechanism of the reversible photoswitch of a fluorescent protein. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 2005;102:13070–13074. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0502772102. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Li X, Chung LW, Mizuno H, Miyawaki A, Morokuma K. Primary events of photodynamics in reversible photoswitching fluorescent protein Dronpa. The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters. 2010;1:3328–3333. doi: 10.1021/jp909947c. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Faro AR, Carpentier P, Jonasson… G. Low-temperature chromophore isomerization reveals the photoswitching mechanism of the fluorescent protein Padron. Journal of the …. 2011 doi: 10.1021/ja207001y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Brakemann T, Weber G, Andresen M, Groenhof G, Stiel AC, Trowitzsch S, Eggeling C, Grubmüller H, Hell SW, Wahl MC. Molecular basis of the light-driven switching of the photochromic fluorescent protein Padron. Journal of Biological Chemistry. 2010;285:14603–14609. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M109.086314. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Mizuno H, Mal TK, Wälchli M, Kikuchi A, Fukano T, Ando R, Jeyakanthan J, Taka J, Shiro Y, Ikura M. Light-dependent regulation of structural flexibility in a photochromic fluorescent protein. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2008;105:9227–9232. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0709599105. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Li X, Chung LW, Mizuno H, Miyawaki A, Morokuma K. A theoretical study on the nature of on-and off-states of reversibly photoswitching fluorescent protein Dronpa: absorption, emission, protonation, and Raman. The Journal of Physical Chemistry B. 2009;114:1114–1126. doi: 10.1021/jp909947c. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Andresen M, Stiel AC, Trowitzsch S, Weber G, Eggeling C, Wahl MC, Hell SW, Jakobs S. Structural basis for reversible photoswitching in Dronpa. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2007;104:13005–13009. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0700629104. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35*.Kao YT, Zhu X, Min W. Protein-flexibility mediated coupling between photoswitching kinetics and surrounding viscosity of a photochromic fluorescent protein. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2012;109:3220–3225. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1115311109. Dronpa-3 is used as a reporter to probe the viscosity of intracellular environments.
  • 36.Lippincott-Schwartz J, Snapp… E. Studying protein dynamics in living cells. Reviews Molecular Cell …. 2001 doi: 10.1038/35073068. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Ciruela F. Fluorescence-based methods in the study of protein➜protein interactions in living cells. Current opinion in biotechnology. 2008 doi: 10.1016/j.copbio.2008.06.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Dedecker P, Hotta J, Flors C, Sliwa M, Uji-i H, Roeffaers MBJ, Ando R, Mizuno H, Miyawaki A, Hofkens J. Subdiffraction imaging through the selective donut-mode depletion of thermally stable photoswitchable fluorophores: numerical analysis and application to the fluorescent protein Dronpa. Journal of the American Chemical Society. 2007;129:16132–16141. doi: 10.1021/ja076128z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Hofmann M, Eggeling C, Jakobs S, Hell SW. Breaking the diffraction barrier in fluorescence microscopy at low light intensities by using reversibly photoswitchable proteins. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 2005;102:17565–17569. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0506010102. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Hell SW, Wichmann J. Breaking the diffraction resolution limit by stimulated emission: stimulated-emission-depletion fluorescence microscopy. Optics letters. 1994;19:780–782. doi: 10.1364/ol.19.000780. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41*.Dedecker P, Mo GCH, Dertinger T, Zhang J. Widely accessible method for superresolution fluorescence imaging of living systems. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2012;109:10909–10914. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1204917109. The proposed technique photochromic stochastic optical fluctuation imaging (pcSOFI) does not use specialized equipment and adopts simple and rapid data acquisition, serving as a widely accessible method for superresolution fluorescence imaging of living systems.
  • 42.Dertinger T, Colyer R, Iyer G, Weiss S, Enderlein J. Fast, background-free, 3D super-resolution optical fluctuation imaging (SOFI) Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2009;106:22287–22292. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0907866106. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43*.Zhou XX, Chung HK, Lam AJ, Lin MZ. Optical control of protein activity by fluorescent protein domains. Science. 2012;338:810–814. doi: 10.1126/science.1226854. A Dronpa tetrameric variant is shown to display light-dependent oligomerization. Based on this novel feature, a Fluorescent Light-inducible Protein (FLiP) design is proposed as a generalizable module to create light-inducible proteins.
  • 44.Adam V, Mizuno H, Grichine A, Hotta J, Yamagata Y, Moeyaert B, Nienhaus GU, Miyawaki A, Bourgeois D, Hofkens J. Data storage based on photochromic and photoconvertible fluorescent proteins. J Biotechnol. 2010;149:289–298. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiotec.2010.04.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Wiedenmann J, Ivanchenko… S. EosFP, a fluorescent marker protein with UV-inducible green-to-red fluorescence conversion. Proceedings of the …. 2004 doi: 10.1073/pnas.0403668101. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.De Cremer G, Sels BF, Hotta J, Roeffaers MBJ, Bartholomeeusen E, Coutiño-Gonzalez E, Valtchev V, De Vos DE, Vosch T, Hofkens J. Optical encoding of silver zeolite microcarriers. Advanced Materials. 2010;22:957–960. doi: 10.1002/adma.200902937. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Lukyanov KA, Fradkov AF, Gurskaya NG, Matz MV, Labas YA, Savitsky AP, Markelov ML, Zaraisky AG, Zhao X, Fang Y, et al. Natural animal coloration can Be determined by a nonfluorescent green fluorescent protein homolog. J Biol Chem. 2000;275:25879–25882. doi: 10.1074/jbc.C000338200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

01
02
03
04
05
06

RESOURCES