Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Sep 12.
Published in final edited form as: Psychiatry Res. 2012 Aug 12;203(1):95–99. doi: 10.1016/j.pscychresns.2011.08.014

Table 2.

Pearson’s Correlation Matrix between Imaging Parameters

MD FA MTR GM WM CSF NBPV
FA −0.39
p value 0.034
n 34

MTR −0.50 0.46
p value 0.019 0.033
n 25 25

GM −0.75 0.20 0.53
p value <.001 0.299 0.013
n 33 33 25

WM −0.53 0.50 0.32 0.22
p value 0.005 0.006 0.172 0.270
n 33 33 25 34

CSF 0.85 −0.18 −0.28 −0.80 −0.59
p value <.001 0.339 0.235 <.001 0.001
n 33 33 25 34 34

NBPV −0.76 0.21 0.13 0.52 0.50 −0.74
p value <.001 0.285 0.551 0.005 0.006 <.001
n 33 33 25 34 34 34

NVV 0.69 −0.16 −0.11 −0.49 −0.42 0.65 −0.70
p value <.001 0.411 0.610 0.006 0.023 <.001 <.001
n 33 33 25 34 34 34 34

FA: fractional anisotropy; MD: mean diffusivity; GM: gray matter; WM: white matter; CSF: cerebrospinal fluid; NBPV: norm brain parenchymal volume; NVV: norm ventricular volume.