Skip to main content
. 2013 Sep 12;9(9):e1003180. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003180

Figure 5. Cancellation of global stimulus with feedback saturation.

Figure 5

(A) Model predictions of the level of cancellation of global signals as a function of contrast, for different signal AM frequencies (colored lines) and different learning contrasts considered (different panels). We have introduced here a factor Inline graphic which takes into account the saturation of the feedback pathway for high stimulus contrasts. The gray line indicates the frequency-average cancellation levels measured experimentally (from data in Fig. 1C). (B) Degradation level (defined as the quantity Inline graphic, once frequency is averaged) as a function of the contrast for different learning contrasts (red Inline graphic, green Inline graphic, blue Inline graphic, violet Inline graphic). Symbols denote experimental data. As we can see, the optimal learning contrast is around Inline graphic.