Skip to main content
. 2013 Sep 12;9(9):e1003754. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1003754

Figure 6. A summary of our coalescent model of the history of C. rubella.

Figure 6

A) The relative composite log-likelihood surface as function of Inline graphic and Inline graphic. B) The probability that all individuals coalesce to the same founding haplotype (Inline graphic) as a function of Inline graphic and three estimates of values Inline graphic (the MLE, lower and upper confidence intervals). The dotted red line indicates the value of (Inline graphic) directly estimated from the data. C) A summary of simulation results (assuming Inline graphic). C1) The frequency of singletons, doubletons, and tripletons observed in simulation (full lines), and estimated from our data (dashed lines) conditional on all four samples deriving from the same founding haplotype. C2) The frequency of one, two, three or four lineages surviving to the founding event. When Inline graphic is large, Inline graphic is the probability that all samples coalesce to the same founding haplotype. The dotted black line portrays the estimated frequency of all four samples residing on one founding haplotype Inline graphic. D) The estimated current effective number of chromosomes in C. rubella (Inline graphic) as a function of the number of founding chromosomes (Inline graphic). We plot this for three different values of Inline graphic (the MLE, as well as the lower and upper confidence intervals). These results are robust to haplotype labeling criteria in Figure 6 (see Text S1, Figure S6).