Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Jul 22.
Published in final edited form as: J Gerontol Soc Work. 2013 Jul 22;56(6):535–553. doi: 10.1080/01634372.2013.811145

Table 3.

Family and Staff Perceptions and Well-Being, by Setting Type

Family Measures Direction and range of scale NH (N=135) RC/AL (N=353) Unadjusted Adjusted
Mean SD Mean SD p pa
Family Perceptions of Caregiving Role - conflict with staff Neg 1–5 2.47 (0.62) 2.46 (0.63) .92 .61
Family Perceptions of Caregiving Role - guilt Neg 1–5 2.29 (0.72) 2.27 (0.68) .99 .008
Family Perceptions of Caregiving Role - loss Neg 1–5 2.79 (0.84) 2.58 (0.74) .09 .29
Family Perceptions of Care - management Pos 1–5 3.13 (0.53) 3.22 (0.64) .47 .76
Family Perceptions of Care - physical care Pos 1–5 3.39 (0.58) 3.57 (0.57) .09 .58
Family Perceptions of Care - activities for residents Pos 1–5 3.08 (0.73) 3.16 (0.73) .61 .37
Interpersonal Conflict Scale Neg 7–35 10.16 (3.91) 9.80 (3.59) .45 .21
Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale Neg 0–10 2.61 (2.28) 2.43 (2.23) .48 .040
Zarit Burden Interview - social consequences Neg 0–24 2.50 (3.68) 3.49 (3.73) .029 .11
Zarit Burden Interview - psychological burden Neg 0–24 3.45 (3.59) 5.62 (4.18) <.001 .08
Zarit Burden Interview - guilt Neg 0–16 4.69 (3.32) 4.95 (2.93) .49 .11
Lawton Caregiving Appraisal - burden Neg 10–50 17.12 (6.34) 18.87 (6.73) .05 .035
Lawton Caregiving Appraisal - satisfaction Pos 5–25 20.17 (4.38) 19.11 (3.98) .13 .34
Lawton Caregiving Appraisal - impact Neg 4–20 4.91 (1.65) 5.58 (1.92) .006 .09
 Staff Measures Direction and range of scale NH (N=106) RC/AL (N=291) Unadjusted Adjusted
Mean SD Mean SD p pa
Staff Perceptions of Caregiving Role - burden Neg 1–5 2.21 (0.43) 2.16 (0.49) .43 .12
Staff Perceptions of Caregiving Role - frustration Neg 1–5 3.54 (0.57) 3.65 (0.53) .26 .12
Staff Perceptions of Caregiving Role - dominion Neg 1–5 3.10 (0.54) 3.12 (0.53) .83 .72
Staff Perceptions of Caregiving Role - exclusion Neg 1–5 2.14 (0.36) 2.14 (0.37) .94 .54
Attitudes Toward Families - disruption Pos 1–5 3.41 (0.58) 3.48 (0.52) .39 .25
Attitudes Toward Families - family partners Pos 1–5 3.95 (0.45) 3.93 (0.48) .79 .71
Attitudes Toward Families - family relevance Pos 1–5 2.97 (0.59) 3.04 (0.56) .41 .72
Family Empathy Pos 3–15 8.35 (2.39) 8.62 (2.34) .36 .14
Family Behaviors Pos 4–20 14.31 (2.99) 15.27 (3.04) .008 .28
Interpersonal Conflict Scale Neg 7–35 11.87 (5.18) 11.77 (5.47) .71 .79
Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale Neg 0–10 2.62 (1.98) 2.38 (1.99) .31 51
Work Stressors Inventory Neg 4–20 10.50 (2.95) 10.88 (3.54) .54 .047
Hasslesb Neg 17–85 47.35 (9.98) 44.81 (9.55) .08 .14
Upliftsb Pos 20–100 89.77 (8.08) 86.66 (10.67) .048 .028
Maslach Burnout Inventory - emotional exhaustion Neg 0–54 14.76 (12.28) 13.06 (11.22) .35 .45
Maslach Burnout Inventory - depersonalization Neg 0–30 2.31 (3.16) 1.89 (2.94) .30 .92
Maslach Burnout Inventory - personal accomplishment Pos 0–48 39.65 (7.27) 40.19 (7.45) .56 .53
Feel respected by families as part of healthcare team Pos 1–3 2.63 (0.50) 2.66 (0.48) .66 .08
Would recommend workplace Pos 1–4 3.38 (0.70) 3.31 (0.77) .67 .020
How likely will leave job Neg 1–3 1.41 (0.60) 1.63 (0.78) .040 .62
Absenteeism (average hours missed per month) Neg 0–32 4.9 (3.0) 3.4 (1.5) .13 .004
Turnover (percent) c Neg 0–100 34 (16) 30 (17) .61 .31

Note: Under “Direction of Scale”, “Neg” indicates that higher values represent less favorable scores, and “Pos” indicates that higher values represent more favorable scores. The Family Perceptions of Caregiving Role instrument and Family Perceptions of Care Tool were scored 1–5, which differs from the 1–7 range used by the developers.

a

P values for models with adjustment for family, staff, resident, and site characteristics for which there was a significant difference between NHs and RC/AL settings. Variables for adjustment were: for family, minority race, relationship to resident, and general health; for staff, age and staff role; for residents, general health, ADLs, IADLs, cognitive status, quality of life, depression, and source of payment; for sites, years in operation, size, and proportion of residents receiving state assistance or Medicaid support.

b

The Hassles and Uplifts scales were scored on a scale of 1 (never experienced) to 5 (tremendous hassle/uplift), and a summary score was calculated.

c

Turnover is the proportion of staff enrolled in the study at baseline who left employment (quit or fired) during the following 12 months.