Skip to main content
. 2013 Jun 14;27(9):1038–1043. doi: 10.1038/eye.2013.106

Table 2. Comparisons of means of choroidal thickness in (a) eyes with PCV and wet-AMD, and (b) fellow eyes of PCV patients and of wet-AMD patients with normal subjects.

 
Subfoveal CT
Inf 500
Inf 1000
Inf 1500
Inf 2000
Inf 2500
Sup 500
Sup 1000
Sup 1500
Sup 2000
Sup 2500
Nasal 500
Nasal l1000
Nasal 1500
Nasal 2000
Nasal 2500
Temp 500
Temp 1000
Temp 1500
Temp 2000
Temp 2500
(a)
Mean PCV 285.9 250 253 252.23 244.4 240.7 264 256.1 255.4 256.6 261.6 254 244.2 235.4 235.1 232.6 253.2 250 248.4 250.6 245.3
Mean normal eye 186.7 163.2 164 167.05 164.3 163.1 172.7 174 174.1 174.5 173.3 161.6 161.7 161 162.4 162.9 179.8 180.1 179.5 178.1 177.2
P-value 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Mean wet-AMD 119.4 103.5 101.3 97.2 91.7 89.03 108.3 105.3 100.8 101.8 105.3 99.58 94.15 92.85 87.33 83.45 114.3 109.4 106.4 107 104.3
Mean normal eye 186.7 163.2 164 167.05 164.3 163.1 172.7 174 174.1 174.5 173.3 161.6 161.7 161 162.4 162.9 179.8 180.1 179.5 178.1 177.2
P-value 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.09 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.03 0 0 0.05 0
 
(b)
Fellow eye AMD* 137 124.2 124.2 117.4 110.8 110.4 131.5 129.5 118.7 114.7 119 119 115.5 114.4 110.2 104.1 130.8 131.8 128.5 128.7 124.2
Normal 186.7 163.2 164 167.05 164.3 163.1 172.7 174 174.1 174.5 173.3 161.6 161.7 161 162.4 162.9 179.8 180.1 179.5 178.1 177.2
Fellow eye PCV 199.1 187.5 183.7 180.9 179.8 176.8 186.8 184.2 181.2 177.4 175.7 183.5 179.5 176.8 179.4 179 185.5 187.9 185 183.2 182.1
Normal 186.7 163.2 164 167.05 164.3 163.1 172.7 174 174.1 174.5 173.3 161.6 161.7 161 162.4 162.9 179.8 180.1 179.5 178.1 177.2
P-value 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.01 0.02 0.09 0.4 0.4 0.48 0 0 0 0 0.03 0.02 0.05 0.05 0.07

Abbreviations: AMD, age-related macular degeneration; CT, choroidal thickness; inf 500, inferior point of measurement 500 μm from fovea, and so on till 2500 μm; PCV, polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy; sup, superior; temp, temporal.

*P value could not be calculated, as the number of eyes in the fellow AMD group was less and statistical comparison could not be done with the normal subjects.