Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Sep 1.
Published in final edited form as: Cancer Prev Res (Phila). 2013 Jul 19;6(9):875–885. doi: 10.1158/1940-6207.CAPR-13-0169

Table 4.

Relative Risk of Colorectal Cancer According to Plasma Adiponectin and Soluble Leptin Receptor by Cancer Subsite, in the Nurses’ Health Study (1990–2008) and Health Professionals Follow-up Study (1994–2008)

Q1a
Q2
Q3
Q4
Ptrendc Pheterogeneityd
No. of Cases No. of Cases RR (95% CI)b No. of Cases RR (95% CI)b No. of Cases RR (95% CI)b
Adiponectin
Women 0.36
 Colon cancer 86 56 0.72 (0.47, 1.09) 56 0.67 (0.44, 1.02) 75 0.95 (0.63, 1.43) 0.77
 Rectal cancer 17 21 1.31 (0.65, 2.65) 18 1.18 (0.57, 2.49) 17 1.26 (0.59, 2.71) 0.59
Men 0.95
 Colon cancer 68 48 0.72 (0.46, 1.14) 56 0.89 (0.57, 1.39) 35 0.60 (0.36, 0.98) 0.08
 Rectal cancer 20 13 0.67 (0.32, 1.41) 19 1.03 (0.52, 2.03) 11 0.64 (0.29, 1.40) 0.41
Soluble Leptin Receptor
Women 0.004
 Colon cancer 72 61 0.88 (0.55, 1.40) 76 1.14 (0.71, 1.81) 58 0.91 (0.55, 1.51) 0.54
 Rectal cancer 12 11 1.08 (0.44, 2.66) 26 3.22 (1.44, 7.21) 24 3.45 (1.47, 8.07) 0.005
Men 0.72
 Colon cancer 67 53 0.79 (0.50, 1.25) 50 0.84 (0.52, 1.34) 37 0.69 (0.42, 1.16) 0.19
 Rectal cancer 16 17 1.07 (0.51, 2.23) 16 1.12 (0.53, 2.38) 14 1.10 (0.50, 2.41) 0.80

Abbreviation: CI, confidence interval; Q, quartile; RR, relative risk.

a

Reference category (RR = 1).

b

Adjusted for the same variables as in model 3 in Table 3, but using polytomous logistic regression.

c

Tests for trend were conducted using the median values for each quartile of analyte.

d

Pheterogeneity for associations with colon versus rectal cancer was estimated using likelihood ratio test by comparing the polytomous logistic regression model constraining common effects for all variables on both outcomes to the model allowing the effect for analyte to vary by outcome.