Table 3.
Interactions of neighborhood disadvantage and family conflict for physical aggression trajectories between ages 11 to 18
| Physical Aggression |
||
|---|---|---|
| B | 95% CI | |
| Effects on intercept | ||
| Intercept | 0.232** | (0.100, 0.365) |
| Male | 0.160** | (0.053, 0.267) |
| Socioeconomic disadvantage | 0.007 | (−0.002, 0.015) |
| Social disorganization | 0.003 | (−0.039, 0.045) |
| Family conflict | 0.163** | (0.103, 0.224) |
| Parent-child bonding | −0.037* | (−0.067, −0.006) |
| Parental control | −0.060** | (−0.082, −0.037) |
| Disadvantage*Male | −0.001 | (−0.013, 0.011) |
| Conflict*Male | −0.098* | (−0.188, −0.008) |
| Conflict*Disadvantage | 0.004 | (−0.004, 0.011) |
| Conflict*Disadvantage*Male | −0.008 | (−0.019, 0.003) |
| Effects on linear slope | ||
| Age | 0.118** | (0.065, 0.172) |
| Male | −0.017 | (−0.088, 0.054) |
| Disadvantage | 0.000 | (−0.006, 0.005) |
| Conflict | −0.025 | (−0.065, 0.015) |
| Disadvantage*Male | −0.001 | (−0.009, 0.008) |
| Conflict*Male | 0.067* | (0.009, 0.125) |
| Conflict*Disadvantage | −0.004 | (−0.008, 0.001) |
| Conflict*Disadvantage*Male | 0.007* | (0.001, 0.014) |
| Effects on quadratic slope | ||
| Age-squared | −0.020** | (−0.027, −0.012) |
| Male | 0.004 | (−0.007, 0.015) |
| Disadvantage | 0.000 | (−0.001, 0.001) |
| Conflict | 0.000 | (−0.007, 0.007) |
| Disadvantage*Male | 0.000 | (−0.001, 0.001) |
| Conflict*Male | −0.008† | (−0.018, 0.001) |
| Conflict*Disadvantage | 0.001† | (0.000, 0.001) |
| Conflict*Disadvantage*Male | −0.001* | (−0.002, 0.000) |
Note. CI = confidence interval. Interactions of neighborhood and family variables were dropped when not statistically significant at the .10 level. All analyses controlled for race/ethnicity, parent education, family structure, the number of times the student moved across the five waves of data collection, the type of address geocoded and the precision of the neighborhood geocode match.
†
p < .10
*
p < .05.
**
p < .01