Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Dec 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Am Geriatr Soc. 2013 May 27;61(6):947–956. doi: 10.1111/jgs.12275

Table 2.

Modified Intention-to-Treat Analysis for Primary and Secondary Sleep and Pain Outcomes for the Entire Sample and for the Subgroup Analysis of Participants with Severe Pain at Baseline

Measure Baseline Postintervention 9-Month Follow-Up A Baseline to 9 Months3 Treatment Effect3 Omnibus
P-Valuec
Pair-Wise
P-Valued
Unadjusted
Effect Size
N Mean
(95% CI)
N Adjusted
Mean
(95% Cl)b
N Adjusted
Mean
(95% Cl)b
Adjusted
Mean A
(95% Cl)b
Estimate
(95% Cl)b
Entire sample
  Insomnia severity
    EOC 123 11.51
(10.61–12.42)
122 10.39
(9.36–11.42)
120 10.18
(8.96–11.40)
−1.35
(−2.57 to −0.13)
N/A <.001 N/A
    CBT-P vs EOC 122 11.85
(11.01–12.69)
117 10.53
(8.69–12.36)
111 10.31
(8.33–12.29)
−1.21
(−3.19–0.76)
0.13
(−0.89–1.16)
.80 0.08
(−0.11–0.26)
    CBT-PI vs EOC 122 11.20
(10.28–12.13)
113 8.50
(6.77–10.22)
108 8.28
(6.43–10.13)
−3.24
(−5.09 to −1.39)
−1.89
(−2.83 to −0.96)
<.001 −0.40
(−0.59 to −0.21)
    CBT-PI vs CBT-P −2.03
(−3.01 to −1.04)
<.001 −0.48
(−0.67 to −0.29)
  Pain severity
    EOC 123 4.13
(3.86–4.41)
122 4.08
(3.68–4.48)
120 3.96
(3.45–4.48)
−0.38 (−0.90–0.13) N/A .54 N/A
    CBT-P vs EOC 122 4.34
(4.06–4.62)
117 4.16
(3.64–4.69)
111 4.04
(3.44–4.65)
−0.30
(−0.91–0.30)
0.082
(−0.21–0.38)
N/A 0.13
(−0.05–0.32)
    CBT-PI vs EOC 122 4.57
(4.30–4.84)
113 3.99
(3.45–4.52)
108 3.87
(3.26–4.48)
−0.48
(v1.09–0.13)
−0.095
(−0.37–0.18)
N/A 0.04
(−0.15–0.23)
  Sleep efficiencye
    EOC 118 83.01
(81.40–84.63)
115 81.02
(79.11–82.93)
107 80.85
(78.70–83.00)
−1.74
(−3.88–0.41)
N/A .006 N/A
    CBT-P vs EOC 114 83.09
(81.49–84.70)
101 83.93
(80.85–87.00)
93 83.76
(80.61–86.91)
1.17
(–1.98–4.33)
2.91
(0.85–4.97)
.006 0.35
(0.15–0.54)
    CBT-PI vs EOC 112 81.62
(79.93–83.32)
96 83.66
(80.05–87.28)
94 83.49
(79.74–87.25)
0.91
(−2.85–4.66)
2.64
(0.44–4.84)
.02 0.31
(0.11–0.51)
    CBT-PI vs CBT-P −0.26
(−2.82–2.29)
.84 −0.04
(−0.25–0.16)
  AIMS symptom subscale
    EOC 123 6.10
(5.71–6.50)
122 6.70
(6.32–7.07)
120 6.86
(6.41–7.31)
0.84
(0.38–1.29)
N/A .53 N/A
    CBT-P vs EOC 122 5.90
(5.49–6.31)
117 6.64
(6.02–7.26)
111 6.80
(6.12–7.48)
0.78
(0.10–1.46)
−0.06
(−0.39–0.28)
N/A −0.10
(−0.28–0.08)
    CBT-PI vs EOC 121 6.06
(5.68–6.44)
112 6.90
(6.17–7.64)
107 7.06
(6.32–7.81)
1.04
(0.29–1.79)
0.20
(−0.26–0.66)
N/A 0.10
(−0.09–0.29)
Participants with severe pain at baseline
  Insomnia severity
    EOC 41 13.51
(11.94–15.08)
41 12.25
(10.05–14.46)
40 12.14
(9.65–14.63)
–0.79
(–3.28–1.70)
N/A .01 N/A
    CBT-P vs EOC 43 12.67
(11.11–14.24)
42 11.96
(8.12–15.80)
41 11.84
(7.81–15.88)
–1.08
(–5.12–2.95)
−0.29
(−2.36–1.77)
.78 −0.17
(−0.45–0.11)
    CBT-PI vs EOC 52 12.67
(11.25–14.09)
48 9.55
(5.41–13.68)
44 9.43
(5.18–13.68)
−3.50
(−7.75–0.75)
−2.71
(−4.91 to −0.51)
.02 −0.49
(−0.74 to −0.24)
    CBT-PI vs CBT-P −2.42
(−4.15–0.68)
.006 −0.32
(−0.59 to −0.06)
  Pain severity
    EOC 41 5.89
(5.67–6.12)
41 5.42
(4.69–6.16)
40 5.29
(4.38–6.20)
−0.69
(−1.60–0.22)
N/A .27 N/A
    CBT-P vs EOC 43 6.07
(5.78–6.36)
42 5.26
(4.15–6.37)
41 5.13
(3.96–6.30)
−0.85
(−2.02–0.32)
−0.16
(−0.68–0.37)
N/A 0.03
(−0.26–0.33)
    CBT-PI vs EOC 52 5.98
(5.77–6.19)
48 4.98
(3.83–6.12)
44 4.84
(3.64–6.04)
−1.14
(−2.34 to −0.06)
−0.44
(−1.00–0.11)
N/A −0.18
(−0.46–0.09)
  Sleep efficiencye
    EOC 41 81.24
(78.34–84.14)
41 79.26
(75.86–82.66)
36 78.88
(75.44–82.32)
−1.83
(−5.27–1.61)
N/A .004 N/A
    CBT-P vs EOC 40 79.92
(76.19–83.65)
32 84.70
(79.76–89.64)
32 84.32
(79.75–88.90)
3.62
(−0.96–8.19)
5.45
(1.56–9.33)
.006 0.50
(0.20–0.80)
    CBT-PI vs EOC 46 80.91
(78.36–83.46)
40 82.94
(77.22–88.66)
36 82.56
(76.43–88.70)
1.86
(−4.28–7.99)
3.69
(0.72–6.66)
.01 0.44
(0.19–0.69)
    CBT-PI vs CBT-P −1.76
(−6.10–2.58)
.43 −0.09
(−0.37–0.19)
  AIMS symptom subscale
    EOC 41 4.88
(4.26–5.49)
41 5.60
(4.75–6.44)
40 5.87
(4.89–6.86)
1.01
(0.02–2.00)
N/A .79 N/A
    CBT-P vs EOC 43 4.67
(3.95–5.39)
42 5.64
(4.32–6.97)
41 5.92
(4.52–7.32)
1.06
(−0.34–2.45)
0.05
(−0.60–0.69)
N/A −0.07
(−0.36–0.22)
    CBT-PI vs EOC 52 5.02
(4.45–5.58)
48 5.87
(4.35–7.40)
44 6.15
(4.55–7.75)
1.29
(−0.31–2.88)
0.28
(−0.55–1.10)
N/A 0.06
(−0.21–0.32)

CI = confidence interval; N/A = not applicable; AIMS = Arthritis Impact Measurement Scale.

a

Decrease indicates improvement for insomnia severity and pain severity; increase indicates improvement for sleep efficiency and arthritis symptoms.

b

Means and treatment effect estimates adjusted for baseline values of relevant outcome, age, depression, modified Mini-Mental State Examination score, analgesic use, hypnotic use, an indicator of whether the outcome was measured at 9 months, and the clinic at which the intervention was delivered.

c

P-value for omnibus Wald test employing both posttreatment visits (postintervention and 9 months) controlled for baseline values, depression, cognitive status, opioid and hypnotic medication use, and clinic.

d

Pair-wise P-values for cognitive–behavioral therapy for pain (CBT-P) minus education-only control (EOC), cognitive–behavioral therapy for pain and insomnia (CBT-PI) minus EOC, and CBT-PI minus CBT-P. P-values correspond to a two-sided test of the null hypothesis that the difference between the two means is 0.

e

Sample size differs for sleep efficiency analysis because some actigraphic data were lost because of recording failure; this equipment failure was completely at random. Participants were required to have a minimum of 3 nights of actigraphy data to be included in the analysis (range 3–7 days, mean 6.88 at baseline, 6.83 at posttreatment, and 6.89 days at 9-month assessments).