Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Sep 13.
Published in final edited form as: J Neural Eng. 2011 Jul 13;8(4):046028. doi: 10.1088/1741-2560/8/4/046028

Table 4.

Confusion matrix of consonant decoding for overt speech. The column labels correspond to the predicted consonants pair in a given trial. The row labels correspond to the correct consonant pair. The values in each cell give frequencies in percent and the standard deviation calculated across subjects. This table represents a composite of frequencies derived from all 126 combinations of 4 of nine consonants. The best consonant pair (R_D) is marked in red.

% B_T K_N H_D L_D M_N P_P R_D S_T T_N
B_T 23.2±9.9 8.8±6.5 11.2±4.1 10.6±4.7 9.8±4.1 7.5±3.7 7.2±6.2 9.6±3.9 12.2±3.4
K_N 9.2±4.5 20.9±5.2 9.8±3.5 8.0±4.3 7.5±3.9 12.7±3.4 13.3±1.9 10.5±4.1 8.1±4.5
H_D 9.2±4.9 8.9±4.8 27.2±7.2 10.7±3.9 8.3±5.4 7.4±2.9 8.3±4.1 11.2±4.5 8.8±3.8
L_D 13.8±3.7 8.1±4.3 11.4±5.1 21.8±4.2 8.9±3.4 9.6±2.7 6.2±4.1 8.9±2.2 11.37±3.1
M_N 10.9±2.3 7.9±4.2 11.8±5.6 7.9±3.6 27.6±9.1 7.5±2.9 6.8±4.8 8.2±3.0 11.19±2.6
P_P 6.4±2.2 14.4±2.7 10.8±4.7 9.7±3.9 6.9±2.4 24.3±5.2 10.5±2.1 9.6±2.3 7.2±2.9
R_D 7.9±4.7 13.6±5.8 8.4±4.3 6.2±2.7 6.9±4.8 9.9±3.9 32.9±12.5 7.9±3.7 6.3±3.7
S_T 10.9±3.9 11.6±4.8 11.2±3.3 10.0±2.3 7.8±2.7 9.4±3.1 8.4±2.6 22.7±5.2 7.9±1.3
T_N 12.5±3.9 7.1±3.4 12.6±4.8 11.5±2.7 10.9±2.4 6.9±2.2 6.5±4.7 8.1±2.3 23.7±6.0