Table 1.

Intercept values for the missing data models from simulation studies

(ρxy, ρxz, ρyz, ρxy.z, τxy.z	Intercept values
(.105, .03, .21, .1,.1)
20% missing	(β0,r1 = 3.1, β0,r2 = 2.4, β0,r3 = 1.4)
35% missing	(β0,r1 = 2.0, β0,r2 = 1.6, β0,r3 = 0.6)
50% missing	(β0,r1 = 1.5, β0,r2 = 0.5, β0,r3 = 0)
(.35, .1, .15, .34,.36)
20% missing	(β0,r1 = 3.2, β0,r2 = 2.4, β0,r3 = 1.3)
35% missing	(β0,r1 = 2.0, β0,r2 = 1.7, β0,r3 = 0.6)
50% missing	(β0,r1 = 1.4, β0,r2 = 0.6, β0,r3 = 0)
(.64, .5, .4, .55,.63),
20% missing	(β0,r1 = 3.3, β0,r2 = 2.5, β0,r3 = 1.5)
35% missing	(β0,r1 = 2.0, β0,r2 = 1.7, β0,r3 = 0.6)
50% missing	(β0,r1 = 1.3, β0,r2 = 0.5, β0,r3 = 0)
(.9, .83, .7, .8,1.1)
20% missing	(β0,r1 = 3.4, β0,r2 = 2.4, β0,r3 = 1.6)
35% missing	(β0,r1 = 2.0, β0,r2 = 1.7, β0,r3 = 0.6)
50% missing	(β0,r1 = 1.2, β0,r2 = 0.4, β0,r3 = 0