Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Jul 15.
Published in final edited form as: Bioorg Med Chem Lett. 2013 May 14;23(14):4253–4257. doi: 10.1016/j.bmcl.2013.04.096

Table 2.

Binding affinities to BIR2 or BIR3 domains of XIAP for tripeptide analogues where R4 = NHPh (2a, 8h–p).

graphic file with name nihms482181t2.jpg
Cmpds. P3 BIR2 Ki, μMa BIR3 Ki, μMa BIR2 vs BIR3 Selectivity
2a Pro 0.39 (± 0.17) 1.08 (± 0.06) 3 : 1
8h Ala 2.29 (± 0.37) 51.79 (± 2.16) 22.6 : 1
8i Val 3.04 (± 0.28) 65.62 (± 6.22) 21.6 : 1
8j ArgNO2 1.18 (± 0.11) 8.79 (± 1.11) 7.5 : 1
8k Arg 3.65 (± 0.23) 21.15 (± 1.77) 5.8 : 1
8l Thr 4.67 (± 0.37) 30.07 (± 0.55) 6.4 : 1
8m OrnCBZ 1 70 (± 01 3) 9.82 (± 1.17) 5.8 : 1
8n Orn 13.14 (± 1.19) ~39 3 : 1
8o Ser 5.46 (± 0.56) > 39 > 7.1 : 1
8p Lys 1.88 (± 0.13) 21.48 (± 1.52) 11.4 : 1
a

Values are determined in duplicate and reported ± standard deviation which is given in parentheses.