Skip to main content
. 2013 May 30;68(10):2234–2244. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkt180

Table 1.

Analysis of discordance in phenotypic and/or genotypic resistance predictions for 74 E. coli bloodstream isolates

Antibiotic Discrepancies (n; % of total, 74 isolates)
Agreement of gradient diffusion with genotype in all discrepancies (n/total discrepancies; %) Agreement of gradient diffusion with genotype in BD Phoenix-concordant discrepancies (n/number of BD Phoenix-concordant discrepancies; %)
S/Ra discordant BD Phoenix BD Phoenix S/S, genotype R BD Phoenix R/R, genotype S
Amoxicillin 0 (0) 2 (3) 0 (0) 1/2 (50) 1/2 (50)
Co-amoxiclav 5 (7) 0 (0) 15 (20) 20/20 (100) 15/15 (100)
Gentamicin 1 (1) 0 (0) 0 (0) 1/1 (100) NAb
Ciprofloxacin 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0) NA NA
Ceftriaxone 0 (0) 1 (1) 1 (1) 0/2 (0) 0/2 (0)
Ceftazidime 1 (1) 11 (15) 1 (1) 1/13 (8) 1/12 (8)
Meropenem 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0) NA NA
Total 7/518 (1)c 14/518 (3)c 17/518 (3)c 23/38 (61) 17/31 (55)

aS/R denotes susceptible/resistant category. Initial BD Phoenix intermediate results were counted as resistant—this occurred in one isolate with an S/R discrepancy for ceftazidime and one isolate with an S/R discrepancy for gentamicin.

bNA = not applicable.

cn/overall total of 518 antimicrobial susceptibility results (%).