Table 2.

LNS and LS target-distracter configurations used by Saumier and Arguin (2003). Notes: The letters refer to shapes in Figure 7A. The fifth column represents the direction of the effect observed in the data. In all but one LNS and LS pair, we found that LNS searches were significantly harder (p < 0.05) than the corresponding LS search, using analyses identical to those described in Table 1. For the remaining pair, the LNS and LS searches were not significantly different.

Condition	No.	LNS configuration			LS configuration			Effect direction (LNS vs. LS)
		T	D1	D2	T	D1	D2
Similar distracters	1	T	J	N	T	N	L	LNS > LS
	2	T	K	O	T	K	M	LNS > LS
	3	T	I	M	T	I	O	LNS > LS
	4	T	L	P	T	P	N	n.s.
Dissimilar distracters	5	T	B	F	T	D	F	LNS > LS
	6	T	D	H	T	F	H	LNS > LS
	7	T	A	E	T	A	G	LNS > LS
	8	T	C	G	T	C	E	LNS > LS