Abstract
In vitro cultures of loquat cultivar Mardan were established using shoot apices after treating with NaOCl (5%, 7%, 10%, 12%, 14% (v/v)) for 12 min and HgCl2 (0.01%, 0.05%, 0.10%, 0.20%, 0.25% (w/v)) for 2 min. A maximum survival rate of 70% was recorded after surface sterilization with 10% NaOCl. Caulogenic response was assessed on Murashige and Skoog (MS) medium fortified with assorted combinations of the cytokinins, benzylaminopurine (BAP), kinetin, and N6-(2-isopentyl)adenine (2iP). Treatment of BAP 1.5 mg/L combined with 2iP 9.0 mg/L and kinetin 1.5 mg/L was found to be optimum for shoot morphogenesis in terms of the number and subsequent growth of shoots, while the highest shoot length was yielded by the combination of BAP 0.5 mg/L, kinetin 0.5 mg/L, and 2iP 3 mg/L. Higher levels of cytokinins induced callogenesis, vitrification and stunted growth to some extent. For rhizogenesis, uniform sized micro-shoots were excised and transferred to half-strength MS medium containing auxins. The best rooting expression was observed with naphthaleneacetic acid (NAA) 1 mg/L combined with indole-3-butyric acid (IBA) 2 mg/L and paclobutrazol (PBZ) 1 mg/L.
Keywords: Eriobotrya japonica, Micropropagation, Sterilization of loquat, Plant growth regulator, Shoot proliferation, Rhizogenesis
1. Introduction
Loquat (Eriobotrya japonica Lindl.) is an important evergreen fruit crop of subtropical regions. It is grown in more than thirty countries (Feng et al., 2007) with China having the leading share (Lin, 2007). It is a popular fruit in Pakistan and is available to satisfy consumer needs in spring when no other fruit is available in the market, thus fetching good prices. However, until recently (Hussain et al., 2007), it has been neglected in terms of research. In Pakistan, most of the loquat orchards were established using seeds due to the unavailability of certified and true to type planting stock in local nurseries. Consequently, there is a lack of uniformity among plants giving low quality fruits with low yield. Cultivation of superior genotypes of loquat may increase production, thereby increasing availability for the home market and for export (Hussain et al., 2007). Loquat cultivar Mardan has large, round, and attractive fruit with an orange yellow skin and sweet tasting pulp (Hussain, 2009) which can help it to capture local and export markets.
Plant cell, tissue, and organ culture techniques are becoming an integral part of propagation systems for year-round supply of clonal plant material on a mass scale (Al-Sulaiman and Barakat, 2010) in a very short time span, which is impossible by conventional approaches (Barakat, 2008). Their application will also satisfy sanitary and phytosanitory (SPS) demands in the context of the World Trade Organization (WTO). The current lack of certified germplasm repositories and seasonal fluctuations in supply require immediate application of in vitro techniques to overcome these problems of the fruit industry. Biotechnological tools for mass propagation of different tree species have been introduced recently, particularly in the last decade (Azad et al., 2005; George et al., 2008), and micropropagation protocols are available for many species and cultivars (Ruzic and Vujovic, 2008). However, propagation of woody plants in vitro is an intricate process. Clonal propagation of loquat using in vitro techniques has been carried out earlier (Lomtatidze et al., 2009), but there is a need to optimize cultivar specific protocols as no trials have been made for indigenous loquat genotypes. Shoot tip culture is highly reliable and is the preferred technique for obtaining disease-free stock (Panjaitan et al., 2007), while production of vigorous shoots with a rapid rate of multiplication is one of the prerequisites of reliable micropropagation practice. In vitro root development for subsequent acclimatization is another important factor determining the success of micropropagation. Cytokinins are a class of plant growth regulators (PGRs) involved in many processes of plant growth, including cell division and shoot and root morphogenesis. In particular, PGRs are known to regulate axillary bud growth. Auxins have a cardinal role in coordination of many growth processes in a plant’s life cycle and are essential for plant root development (Nordstrom et al., 2004). Considering the importance of these PGRs, this study aimed to evaluate different types and concentrations of cytokinins and auxins for in vitro shoot development and rhizogenesis in loquat.
Protocols standardized following this study will be conducive for the micropropagation of elite loquat genotypes on a commercial scale, which will finally uplift the national horticulture industry and export potential.
2. Materials and methods
Shoot tips (3–4 cm in size) of loquat cultivar Mardan were collected from the orchard of Tret (Murree, Pakistan) to be used as explants for in vitro culture establishment. After removing leaves, hairs, and dirt, they were placed under running tap water with one drop of Tween 80 and detergent for 30 min to remove any foreign contaminants. After washing, shoot apices were dissected and surface sterilized with different concentrations of NaOCl (5%, 7%, 10%, 12%, 14% (v/v)) for 12 min and HgCl2 (0.01%, 0.05%, 0.10%, 0.20%, 0.25% (w/v)) for 2 min in a laminar air flow hood. Inoculation was done in culture jars containing Murashige and Skoog (MS) shoot proliferation media (MS macro, micro salts, and vitamins), supplemented with various combinations of cytokinins (BAP, 2iP, and kinetin) (Table 1). Data were recorded after 28 d for the number of shoots, shoot length (cm), number of leaves, and fresh and dry weights (mg).
Table 1.
Treatment | Cytokinin (mg/L) |
||
BAP | 2iP | Kinetin | |
TC0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
TC1 | 0.5 | 3.0 | 0.5 |
TC2 | 1.0 | 6.0 | 1.0 |
TC3 | 1.5 | 9.0 | 1.5 |
TC4 | 2.0 | 12.0 | 2.0 |
BAP: benzylaminopurine; 2iP: N6-(2-isopentyl)adenine
For root induction, uniform sized (1.5 cm) micro-shoots were transferred to rooting medium (half strength of MS) supplemented with different levels of indole-3-butyric acid (IBA) in combination with naphthaleneacetic acid (NAA) and paclobutrazol (PBZ) (Table 2). Data were recorded after six weeks for rooting percentage, number of roots, and root length (cm).
Table 2.
Treatment | Auxin (mg/L) |
||
NAA | IBA | PBZ | |
TA0 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
TA1 | 0.25 | 0.50 | 0.25 |
TA2 | 0.50 | 1.00 | 0.50 |
TA3 | 0.75 | 1.50 | 0.75 |
TA4 | 1.00 | 2.00 | 1.00 |
TA5 | 1.25 | 2.50 | 1.25 |
NAA: naphthaleneacetic acid; IBA: indole-3-butyric acid; PBZ: paclobutrazol
The experiment was designed as a single factorial with three replications for each treatment and five plants per replication. Data were statistically analyzed using the analysis of variance (ANOVA) (MSTAT-C software) and means were compared using the least significant difference (LSD) test at 5% α level (Steel et al., 1997).
3. Results and discussion
3.1. Culture establishment
Surface sterilization of loquat is a very difficult step in culture initiation due to its hairy nature. Furthermore, exudation of phenolics and browning are other common problems associated with its in vitro culture, as with other members of the Rosaceae family (Bhojwani and Razdan, 1983; Amin and Jaiswal, 1987). NaOCl is the most suitable disinfectant for a variety of plant species. It plays a significant role in eliminating microorganisms from the surface of explants (Canli and Kazaz, 2009). However, the efficacy of surface sterilization can be improved by standardizing the most appropriate combination of dose and exposure time of disinfectants (Yildiz and Er, 2002).
3.2. Effects of NaOCl and HgCl2 on in vitro culture establishment of loquat cultivar Mardan
Data regarding the effect of disinfectants on surface sterilization of loquat shoot tips after 28 d are presented in Fig. 1. Treatment with 10% NaOCl showed significant results with an increased survival percentage (70%). Treatment with 14% NaOCl resulted in minimum survival (2%) and maximum necrosis (90%) (Fig. 1a). Generally, necrosis increased as the concentration of NaOCl increased which shows that higher concentrations of NaOCl damage young tissues. Fungal and bacterial contamination was high (86.66%) after treatment with 5% NaOCl, but absent after treatment with 14% NaOCl. The highest NaOCl concentration badly damaged the explants and decreased the survival rate.
HgCl2 significantly reduced contamination (to 3.33%) after treatment of 0.25% HgCl2 but increased mortality (to 53.3%). Percentage survival was highest (63.33%) after treatment of 0.10% HgCl2 followed by 0.20% HgCl2 (43.33%) (Fig. 1b). The percentage survival after treatments of 0 and 0.05% HgCl2 was not significantly different (40%). Increases in the concentration of HgCl2 showed increasing necrosis and mortality, but a decline in contamination. HgCl2 is one of the strongest disinfectants used in culture establishment. The action of HgCl2 may be through lysis of cells of microorganisms or it may act on thiol groups in microbial enzymes. Like NaOCl, HgCl2 is known to be a powerful antimicrobial agent (Russell and Chopra, 1990). Treatment with 0.10% HgCl2 for 5–7 min is used commonly for surface sterilization of many plant species (Skirvin et al., 1986). El-Zaher (2008) obtained good results with 0.30% HgCl2 for 5 min in jackfruit. Our results are in line with the findings of Chavan et al. (1996) who stated that HgCl2 at 0.20% for 4 min or at 0.10% for 10 min gave good sterilization results in shoot tip cultures of jackfruit.
Comparison of the two sterilizing agents showed that NaOCl gave a maximum survival rate of 70% and a minimum mortality rate of 10% after treatment of 10% NaOCl, while HgCl2 gave a maximum survival rate of 63.33% after treatment of 0.10% HgCl2 and a minimum mortality rate of 6.66% after treatment of 0.01% HgCl2. From the above results, we infer that treatment with NaOCl at 10% performed better than treatment with HgCl2. NaOCl is also a readily available and economical sterilant.
3.3. Effects of cytokinins on shoot development
3.3.1. Number of shoots
Different combinations of cytokinins (BAP+2iP+kinetin) interacted significantly in terms of the number of shoots (Fig. 2). Treatment TC3 (BAP 1.5+2iP 9.0+kinetin 1.5 mg/L) yielded the maximum number of shoots (4.84) followed by TC4 (BAP 2.0+2iP 12.0+kinetin 2.0 mg/L) at 3.25 (Fig. 3a). Increasing BAP doses in combination with 2iP+kinetin had an increasing effect up to a certain level (TC3), after which a declining trend was observed in shoot growth. Our findings are in accordance with the results of Al-Maarri and Al-Ghamdi (1995), who reported that application of BAP and 2iP produced a good response for initiation and multiplication of shoot tip cultures in date palm. Histological studies showed that the inclusion of BAP in shoot proliferation media enhanced the growth of axial shoots and promoted the multiplication of shoots from the basal tissues of explants (Ohki and Sawaki, 1999). The successful use of BAP for shoot production may be accredited to the capability of plant tissues to metabolize BAP more efficiently than other synthetic PGRs or to the capacity of BAP to encourage the production of natural hormones, such as zeatin, within the tissues (Malik et al., 2005). Kukreja et al. (1990) and Vincent et al. (1992) also reported a decline in the number of shoots with higher BAP levels. Waseem et al. (2009) showed that the use of higher than optimal concentrations of PGRs may lead to poor performance.
Rapid growth and multiplication of shoots are based on the quantity and quality of cytokinins and auxins in media as well as on their endogenous levels in plants, which vary from species to species and between growth phases (Panjaitan et al., 2007). BAP manipulates shoot production by stimulating rapid cell division to induce multiple shoot formation (Roy and Banerjee, 2003; Ronzhina, 2003). Lane (1992) reported that shoot production was improved in response to BAP application. In olive, 2iP at 10 mg/L produced a high number of shoots (Agrawal et al., 1991). Similarly, Al-Sulaiman and Barakat (2010) documented that the presence of 2iP in the medium at 10.0 mg/L had a positive effect on the production of lateral shoots and other growth parameters of Ziziphus spinachristi. Increases in shoot number might be related to the application of an appropriate dose of cytokinin which promotes bud growth and overcomes apical dominance (Asaad et al., 2009).
3.3.2. Shoot length
Data presented in Fig. 2 show that the shoot length was markedly affected by various combinations of cytokinins. Statistically, longer shoots (1.97 and 1.92 cm) were obtained with treatments TC2 (BAP 1.0+2iP 6.0+kinetin 1.0 mg/L) and TC1 (BAP 0.5+2iP 3.0+kinetin 0.5 mg/L), respectively, followed by TC3 (BAP 1.5+2iP 9.0+kinetin 1.5 mg/L) (1.74 cm) (Fig. 3b). After treatment TC4 (BAP 2.0+2iP 12.0+kinetin 2.0 mg/L) with elevated levels of cytokinins, shoot length decreased to 1.56 cm, demonstrating the negative impact of increased doses of PGRs as reported by Carelli and Echeverrigary (2002). Cytokinins release apical dominance, which hastens axillary bud formation and reduces the length of explants (Huetteman and Preece, 1993). Increased BAP levels in shoot multiplication media suppress shoot growth due to the regeneration of multiple shoots (Waseem et al., 2009). Singh and Arora (1995) similarly reported that increasing BAP concentrations increased the number of shoots but depressed the shoot length in chrysanthemum. At minimum levels, cytokinins produce longer shoots, which may be due to their reduction in number. Baig et al. (2011) also found that BAP is a strong cytokinin which reduces shoot length and increases the number of side shoots. Exposure of cultures to higher concentrations of BAP during regeneration of shoots may lead to an increase in cytokinins, which inhibits further shoot growth (Malik et al., 2005). In woody plants, BAP is paramount for growth compared to kinetin (Fráguas et al., 2004). The frequency of shoot multiplication and the length and number of shoots depends mainly on the optimal level of BAP, after which response declines (Waseem et al., 2009). Higher than optimal concentrations of BAP enhance ethylene production in the base of plants which may block the transport of exogenous auxin in the basal portion of explants and result in minimum shoot growth and development (Ahmad et al., 2003). Yakimova et al. (2000) stated that cultured plants producing large numbers of shoot buds exhibit minimum shoot length because all the nutrients are utilized for the formation of lateral shoots.
The best shoot elongation was observed with 0.6 mg BAP in olive (Ahmad et al., 2003). BAP is preferable to other cytokinins for promoting shoot production and proliferation (Siddique and Anis, 2009). BAP is degraded very slowly in culture medium which makes it available to plant tissues for a longer period of time (Hussain et al., 2011).
3.3.3. Number of leaves
The maximum number of leaves (4.26) was observed after treatment TC3 (BAP 1.5+2iP 9.0+kinetin 1.5 mg/L) followed by TC4 (BAP 2.0+2iP 12.0+kinetin 2.0 mg/L) (Fig. 2). We infer from the results that the combination of cytokinins in treatment TC3 is optimum for better performance, as the shoot number, and therefore the number of leaves, increased with this treatment. In contrast, the leaf count was meager (2.16) of the control treatment, confirming the significance of these phytohormones for leaf growth.
2iP and BAP are important PGRs for bud break and shoot differentiation due to their role in cell multiplication and the breakdown of apical dominance (Casimiro et al., 2001). Multiplication of shoots depends mainly on the number of buds and leaves on an explant. Specific plant hormones may arrest or hasten the growth and development of leaves. Previously, it was indicated that BAP had a strong effect on promoting the growth of leaves and bud initials, causing a rise in the number of bud primordia in chrysanthemum (Karim et al., 2002; 2003). Kapchina-Toteva and Yakimova (1997) reported that peroxidase activities increased following cytokinin application, leading to the sprouting of axillary buds which subsequently developed into leaves. Various scientists have studied the role of cytokinins in bud formation and leaf growth (Mok, 1994).
3.3.4. Fresh and dry weights
Results showed that the maximum fresh weight (200.55 mg) was obtained after treatment TC3 (BAP 1.5+2iP 9.0+kinetin 1.5 mg/L) followed by treatments TC4 (198.88 mg, BAP 2.0+2iP 12.0+kinetin 2.0 mg/L), and TC2 (190.12 mg, BAP 1.0+2iP 6.0+kinetin 1.0 mg/L). The control treatment produced the minimum fresh weight (171.51 mg) (Fig. 4). The combination of BAP, 2iP, and kinetin at 1.5, 9.0, and 1.5 mg/L, respectively, proved to be optimum for the fresh weight of shoots, which is consistent with the results for other parameters (i.e., the number of shoots per explant and the number of leaves). Fresh weight is correlated with the quality of shoots. After treatment TC3, the shoots were quite healthy and had an excellent leaf:stem ratio but after treatment TC4 some vitrified plants were observed (Fig. 5), which reduced the total fresh weight of the plants. Moreover, the decrease in fresh weight after treatment TC4 was due to reduced shoot and leaf number at this level. Vitrified plants are deficient in chlorophyll content and show hyperhydricity, hypolignification, and changes in enzyme activity and protein synthesis, which can cause alterations in normal plant metabolic processes (Ziv, 1992). These results support those of Li et al. (2003) who proposed that the combination of high concentrations of cytokinins with a high water potential in the medium is one of the major causes of vitrification.
Dry weight showed synergism with fresh weight. The maximum accumulation of dry weight (40.04 mg) was after treatment TC3 (BAP 1.5+2iP 9.0+kinetin 1.5 mg/L) followed by TC4 (BAP 2.0+2iP 12.0+kinetin 2.0 mg/L) (39.13 mg). A declining trend was observed in dry matter as the number of shoots and leaves decreased, as for fresh weight. The highest dry weight was found after treatments TC3 and TC4, which we attribute to there being the same amounts of shoots, leaves, and biomass accumulation. Barberaki and Kintzios (2002) reported that the addition of macronutrients in plant tissues is significantly affected by the addition of PGRs. Kinetin and BAP enhance leaf area and maximum dry weight accumulation (de Oliveira et al., 2010). Increases in cytokinin levels lead to increases in the numbers of leaves and shoots, and in the rooting percentage by triggering cell division and elongation (Schmulling et al., 2003). Baig et al. (2011) studied the role of BAP in dry matter accumulation and reported that it may enhance physiological vigor, leading to the conversion of more sugars into dry matter in different regions of explants.
Significant increase in dry weight may be related to sucrose concentrations in media. Sucrose is incorporated into structural carbohydrates in cell walls, which form the major part of a plant’s dry weight (Gollagunta et al., 2004). Moreover, dry weight is affected by an increase in enzyme activities coupled with the production of more shoots. An enhancement of peroxidase activity in response to cytokinins and in association with an increased number of open axillary buds was reported in cultured Rosa hybrida in vitro (Yakimova et al., 2000). The activity of enzymes is induced by high cytokinin concentrations, due to an elevation of the RNA levels from a subset of the genes involved (Taiz and Zeiger, 2002). According to Vuylsteker et al. (1997), the fresh weight of a plant depends on the number of shoots and therefore it may decline due to a reduced shoot number. Bennet et al. (1994) reported that a decrease in fresh weight might arise because kinetin is less effective than BAP in prompting the enzyme activity involved in promoting vegetative growth. High concentrations of cytokinins cause senescence of tissues, possibly due to the production of ethylene, which consequently gives lower fresh weight (George et al., 2008).
3.4. Effects of auxins on root development
3.4.1. Number of roots
Different combinations of auxins significantly affected the number of roots. The maximum number (12.06) was obtained after treatment TA4 (NAA 1.00+IBA 2.00+PBZ 1.00 mg/L) (Fig. 6b) followed by TA5 (NAA 1.25+IBA 2.50+PBZ 1.25 mg/L) (10.34) (Fig. 7). An increasing trend was observed with increasing concentrations of auxins up to the level of treatment TA4 but after that there was a slight reduction in root number with TA5. Rooting response was highly impoverished in the control treatment (TA0).
Auxins play a vital role in regulating the growth and multiplication of plant organs (Woodward and Bartel, 2005; Teale et al., 2006) and in lateral root formation (Ruegger et al., 1997; Rogg et al., 2001). IBA is the most common auxin, and is the strongest, most highly stable and least toxic rooting plant hormone among all auxins (Weisman et al., 1988; Hartmann et al., 2007). George et al. (2008) also found that development and growth of roots is accelerated by auxins, which enhance cell division in the root zone. Root initiation is dependent on the interaction between external and internal factors, such as the type and level of endogenous PGRs. However, auxin is one of the important factors (Asaad et al., 2009). The application of IBA causes changes in the synthesis of protein and the production of RNA. These changes lead to more rapid cell growth and division and, as a result, the number of roots increases (Husen and Pal, 2007). PBZ belongs to the triazole family which includes hormones that act as plant multiprotectants against stresses (Gilley and Fletcher, 1997). The role of PBZ in root initiation is still unknown, but it acts as an antigibberellin in plants (Kefford, 1973). Various scientists have reported that application of PBZ increases antigibberellin compounds, which may promote root production (Kefford, 1973; Tim et al., 1985).
In the present study, we observed that high levels of auxins induced callogenesis in the basal part of shoots and exerted an inhibiting effect on root growth and development. IBA at higher levels enhances degradative metabolism in tissues and inhibits root initiation and development (Baker and Wetzstein, 1994). The findings of Baker and Wetzstein (1994) also suggest that auxins at higher than optimal concentrations may lead to reductions in the number of roots and in the rooting percentage.
3.4.2. Root length
Root length of the loquat genotypes was influenced by the various types and combinations of auxins (Fig. 7). Maximum root length (13.07 cm) was obtained after treatment TA4 (NAA 1.00+IBA 2.00+PBZ 1.00 mg/L) (Fig. 6a) followed by TA5 (NAA 1.25+IBA 2.50+PBZ 1.25 mg/L) (12.33 cm).
With increasing concentrations, auxins greatly promoted root length but at the highest concentrations of NAA, IBA, and PBZ, root length decreased. Auxin concentration is most important for root elongation which may be inhibited by increasing levels of exogenous auxins in the rooting media (Baker and Wetzstein, 1994). Cell multiplication and proliferation are responsible for fresh tissues in the root multiplication zone that direct the regeneration of roots around the periphery of the quiescent region, consequently enhancing root length (Hopkins, 1995). Hu and Wang (1983) reported that the root elongation stage is very responsive to auxin concentration and may be inhibited by higher concentrations.
PBZ application, for in vitro rooting of plants, increases resistance against desiccation (Roberts and Matthews, 1995). Auxins intensify adventitious root initiation due to production of endogenous enzymes, which may hasten cell division, differentiation, and multiplication (Husen and Pal, 2007).
High concentrations of auxin (IBA) reduce root length and number below optimal levels. Ozel and Arslan (2006) reported that they also raise the endogenous auxin levels in plants providing protection against catabolism and increasing interactions with growth inhibitors by conjugation. Plants with long roots and higher root numbers are produced, which is probably due to effect of endogenous hormones (George et al., 2008). Taiz and Zeiger (2002) also found that lower concentrations of auxin promote root growth but higher levels reduce growth due to the production of ethylene in the root zone, which acts as a growth inhibitor. Baker and Wetzstein (1994) observed that the production of degradative metabolites increases with increasing concentrations of IBA, which blocks the root regeneration progress (Rai et al., 2009).
3.4.3. Rooting percentage
Significant differences (P<0.05) were observed among different auxin treatments in terms of rooting percentage (Fig. 7). The highest rooting percentage (99.71%) was recorded after treatment TA3 (NAA 0.75+IBA 1.50+PBZ 0.75 mg/L) followed by treatments TA4 (NAA 1.00+IBA 2.00+PBZ 1.00 mg/L) (74.930%) and TA5 (NAA 1.25+IBA 2.50+PBZ 1.25 mg/L) (67.667%). However, the minimum rooting percentage (16.66%) was recorded in the control treatment. Data showed that IBA at 1.50 mg/L with NAA and PBZ each at 0.75 mg/L was the optimum combination. The rooting percentage showed a decreasing trend with higher concentrations of auxins. Auxins are effective PGRs which enhance the process of root growth and multiplication through the differentiation of vascular tissues (Asghar et al., 2011). Among auxins, IBA is known to stimulate rooting more efficiently due to its weak toxicity and greater stability for root induction (Han et al., 2009). The rooting percentage is increased by increasing the auxin levels, but at higher concentrations the number of roots is decreased (Asghar et al., 2011). Auxins encourage rooting through biochemical changes in the plant system (Henrique et al., 2006). Bhatt and Tomar (2010) found that IBA at a minimum concentration produced the best results.
Differentiation of root primordia due to an optimum concentration of IBA, enhances cambial development at the base of explants, which increases the maximum rooting percentage (Haq et al., 2009). Efficient changes in IBA genes can promote auxin biosynthesis and then alter root development, while PBZ can reduce stem growth due to an antigibberellin effect (Rademacher et al., 1984; Graebe, 1987). PBZ inhibits gibberellin synthesis and ethylene production, and increases cytokinin production in roots (Kamountsis and Chronopoulou-Sereli, 1999). Auxin stimulates the production of growth substances for root development and elongation (Han et al., 2009).
4. Conclusions
The current study documents the protocol optimization for Loquat micropropgation. Results reveal that sodium hypochlorite is an effective sterilant for surface disinfection of loquat shoot tips in vitro. Moreover, this article gives standardized doses of PGRs to achieve considerably higher shoot and root growth for mass scale, healthy and clonal production of this economically important fruit crop. It will consequently lead to the establishment of certified loquat nurseries in the scenario of SPS measures of WTO.
Footnotes
Project (No. 20-1540/R&D/09) supported by the Higher Education Commission (HEC) of Pakistan
Compliance with ethics guidelines: Nadeem Akhtar ABBASI, Tariq PERVAIZ, Ishfaq Ahmed HAFIZ, Mehwish YASEEN, and Azhar HUSSAIN declare that they have no conflict of interest.
This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.
References
- 1.Agrawal DC, Pawar SS, Morwal GC, Mascarenhas AF. In vitro micropropagation of Delphinium malabaricum (Huth) Munz.—a rare species. Ann Bot. 1991;68(3):243–245. [Google Scholar]
- 2.Ahmad T, Rahman HU, Ahmad CMS, Laghari AH. Effect of culture media and growth regulators on micropropagation of peach rootstock GF 677. Pak J Bot. 2003;35(3):331–338. [Google Scholar]
- 3.Al-Maarri KM, Al-Ghamdi AS. Effect of culturing date on in vitro micropropagation of date palm (Phoenix dactylifera L.) cv. Hillaly . Arab Univ J Agric Sci. 1995;3(1):151–167. [Google Scholar]
- 4.Al-Sulaiman MA, Barakat MN. In vitro shoot multiplication of Ziziphus spina-christi by shoot tip culture. Afr J Biotechnol. 2010;9(6):850–857. [Google Scholar]
- 5.Amin MN, Jaiswal VS. Rapid clonal propagation of guava through in vitro shoot proliferation on nodal explants of mature trees. Plant Cell Tissue Org Cult. 1987;9(3):235–243. doi: 10.1007/BF00040809. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Asaad MM, Mosleh MS, Duhoky SMA. In vitro propagation of peach (Prunus persica L.) cv. “Red June”. J Duhok Univ. 2009;12(11):67–73. [Google Scholar]
- 7.Asghar S, Ahmad T, Hafiz IA, Yaseen M. In vitro propagation of orchid (Dendrobium nobile) var. Emma white. Afr J Biotechnol. 2011;10(16):3097–3103. doi: 10.5897/AJB10.401. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Azad MAK, Yokota S, Ohkubo T, Andoh Y, Yahar S, Yoshizawa N. In vitro regeneration of the medicinal woody plant Phellodendron amurense Rupr. through excised leaves. Plant Cell Tissue Org Cult. 2005;80(1):43–50. doi: 10.1007/s11240-004-8809-5. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Baig MMQ, Hafiz IA, Ahmad T, Abbasi NA. An efficient protocol for in vitro propagation of Rosa grussan teplitz and Rosa centifolia . Afr J Biotechnol. 2011;10(22):4564–4573. [Google Scholar]
- 10.Baker CM, Wetzstein HY. Influence of auxin type and concentration on peanut somatic embryogenesis. Plant Cell Tissue Org Cult. 1994;36(3):361–368. doi: 10.1007/BF00046094. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Barakat MN. Application of in vitro culture for resistance to desertification. Met Env Arid Land Agric Sci. 2008;19:3–18. [Google Scholar]
- 12.Barberaki M, Kintzios S. Accumulation of selected macronutrients in mistletoe tissue cultures: effect of medium composition and explant source. Sci Hort. 2002;95(1-2):133–150. doi: 10.1016/S0304-4238(02). [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Bennet IJ, McComb JA, Tonkin CM, McDavid DAJ. Alternating cytokinins in multiplication medium stimulates in vitro shoot growth and rooting of Eukalyptus globules Labill. Ann Bot. 1994;74(1):53–58. doi: 10.1093/aob/74.1.53. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Bhatt BB, Tomar YK. Effects of IBA on rooting performance of Citrus auriantifolia Swingle (Kagzi-lime) in different growing conditions. Nat Sci. 2010;8(7):8–11. [Google Scholar]
- 15.Bhojwani SS, Razdan MK. Plant Tissue Culture: Theory and Practice. Elsevier; 1983. pp. 313–372. [Google Scholar]
- 16.Canli FA, Kazaz S. Biotechnology of roses: progress and future prospects. Suleyman Demirel Univ Orman Fakultesi Dergisi. 2009;1:167–183. [Google Scholar]
- 17.Carelli BP, Echeverrigary S. An improved system for the in vitro propagation of rose cultivars. Sci Hort. 2002;92(1):69–74. doi: 10.1016/S0304-4238(01). [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Casimiro I, Marchant A, Bhalerao RP, Beeckman T, Dhooge S, Swarup R, Graham N, Inzé D, Sandberg G, Casero PJ, et al. Auxin transport promotes Arabidopsis lateral root initiation. Plant Cell. 2001;13(4):843–852. doi: 10.1105/tpc.13.4.843. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Chavan SS, Deshpande RS, Lad BL, Dhonuskake BL. Tissue culture studies in jackfruit. Ann Plant Physiol. 1996;10(2):157–161. [Google Scholar]
- 20.de Oliveira LM, Paiva R, de Santana JRF, Pereira FD, Nogueira RC, Silva LC. Effects of cytokinins on in vitro mineral accumulation and bud development in Annona glabra L. Ciênc Agrotecnol. 2010;34(6):1439–1445. [Google Scholar]
- 21.El-Zaher MHA. Using the grafting for propagation of the jackfruit and producing the rootstocks for the grafting. Am-Euras J Agric Env Sci. 2008;3(3):459–473. [Google Scholar]
- 22.Feng YL, Auge H, Ebeling SK. Invasive Buddleja davidii allocates more nitrogen to its photosynthetic machinery than five native woody species. Oecologia. 2007;153(3):501–510. doi: 10.1007/s00442-007-0759-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Fráguas CB, Pasqual M, Dutra LF, Cazetta JO. Micropropagation of fig (Ficus carica L.) ‘Roxo de Valinhos’ plants. In Vitro Cell Dev Biol Plant. 2004;40(5):471–474. doi: 10.1079/IVP2004562. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 24.George EF, Hall MA, Deklerk GJ. Plant Propagation by Tissue Culture. Springer; 2008. Plant Growth Regulators II: Cytokinins, their Analogues and Antagonists; pp. 206–217. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Gilley A, Fletcher RA. Relative efficacy of paclobutrazol, propiconazole and tetraconazole as stress protectants in wheat seedlings. Plant Growth Regul. 1997;21(3):169–175. doi: 10.1023/A:1005804717016. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Gollagunta V, Jeffrey W, Adelberg JR, Nihal R. Sucrose concentration in liquid media affects soluble carbohydrates, biomass and storage quality of micropropagated hosta. Plant Cell Tissue Org Cult. 2004;77(2):125–131. doi: 10.1023/B:TICU.0000016814.88023.22. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Graebe JE. Gibberellin biosynthesis and control. Ann Rev Plant Physiol. 1987;38:419–465. doi: 10.1146/annurev.pp.38.060187.002223. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Han H, Zhang S, Sun X. A review on the molecular mechanism of plant rooting modulated by auxin. Afr J Biotechnol. 2009;8(3):348–353. [Google Scholar]
- 29.Haq I, Ahmad T, Hafiz IA, Abbasi NA. Influence of microcutting sizes and IBA concentrations on in vitro rooting of olive cv. Dolce agogia . Pak J Bot. 2009;41(3):1213–1222. [Google Scholar]
- 30.Hartmann HT, Kester DE, Davies JFT, et al. Plant Propagation: Principles and Practices. 7th Ed. Prentice-Hall; 2007. Plant Hormones; pp. 292–320. [Google Scholar]
- 31.Henrique A, Campinhos EN, Ono EO, Pinho SZD. Effect of plant growth regulators in the rooting of Pinus cuttings. Brazil Arch Biol Tech. 2006;49(2):189–196. [Google Scholar]
- 32.Hopkins WG. Plant Hormones. Auxins. 2nd Ed. John Wiley & Sons; 1995. Introduction to Plant Physiology; pp. 313–318. [Google Scholar]
- 33.Hu CY, Wang PJ. Meristem, Shoot Tip, Bud Culture. Handbook of Plant Cell Culture. New York: MacMillan; 1983. pp. 177–277. [Google Scholar]
- 34.Huetteman CA, Preece JE. Thidiazuron: a potent cytokinin for woody plant tissue culture. Plant Cell Tissue Org Cult. 1993;33(2):105–119. doi: 10.1007/BF01983223. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Husen A, Pal M. Metabolic changes during adventitious root primordium development in Tectona grandis Linn. f. (teak) cuttings as affected by age of donor plants and auxin (IBA and NAA) treatment. New Forests. 2007;33(3):309–323. doi: 10.1007/s11056-006-9030-7. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Hussain A. Characterization of Loquat Eriobotrya japonica Lindl. Genotypes Cultivated in Pakistan on the Basis of Morpho-Physical Traits and Molecular Markers. Punjab, Pakistan: PMAS-Arid Agriculture University; 2009. pp. 151–152. PhD Thesis. [Google Scholar]
- 37.Hussain A, Abbasi NA, Akhtar A. Fruit Charactristics of Different Loquat Genotypes Cultivated in Pakistan; II Int. Symp. on Loquat; 2007. pp. 287–291. [Google Scholar]
- 38.Hussain A, Abbasi NA, Hafiz IA, Zia UL, Hasan S. A comparison among five loquat genotypes cultivated at Hasan Abdal and Wah. Pak J Agric Sci. 2011;48(2):103–106. [Google Scholar]
- 39.Kamountsis AP, Chronopoulou-Sereli AG. Paclobutrazol affects growth and flower bud production in Gardenia under different light regimes. HortScience. 1999;34(4):674–675. [Google Scholar]
- 40.Kapchina-Toteva V, Yakimova E. Effect of purine and phenylurea cytokinins on peroxidase activity in relation to apical dominance of in vitro cultured Rosa hybrida L. Bulg J Plant Physiol. 1997;23(1-2):40–48. [Google Scholar]
- 41.Karim MZ, Amin MN, Asad ZU, Islam S, Hassin F, Alam R. Rapid multiplication of Chrysanthemum morifolium through in vitro culture. Pak J Biol Sci. 2002;5(11):1170–1172. [Google Scholar]
- 42.Karim MZ, Amin MN, Azad MAK, Begum F, Rehman MM, Ahmad S, Alam R. In vitro shoot multiplication of Chrysanthemum morifolium as affected by sucrose, agar and pH. Biotechnology. 2003;2(2):115–120. [Google Scholar]
- 43.Kefford NP. Effect of hormone antagonist on the rooting of shoot cuttings. Plant Physiol. 1973;51(1):214–216. doi: 10.1104/pp.51.1.214. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Kukreja AK, Mathur AK, Zaim M. Mass production of virus-free patchouli plants [Pogostemon cabin (Blanco) Benth] by in vitro culture. Trop Agric. 1990;67(2):101–104. [Google Scholar]
- 45.Lane WD. Micropropagation of Apple (Malus domestica Barkh.) In: Bajaj YPS, editor. High-Tech and Micropropagation II. Springer; 1992. pp. 229–243. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Li S, Li W, Yang DL, Cao ZY. Advance of research vitrification in plant test-tube plantlets. J Gansu Agric Univ. 2003;38(1):1–16. (in Chinese) [Google Scholar]
- 47.Lin SQ. World Loquat Production and Research with Special Reference to China. II Int. Symp. on Loquat; Guangzhou, China; 2007. pp. 37–44. [Google Scholar]
- 48.Lomtatidze N, Zarnadze N, Alasania N, Zarnadze R. In vitro morphogenesis of loquat Eriobotria japonica L. Bull Georg Nat Acad Sci. 2009;3(1):123–125. [Google Scholar]
- 49.Malik SK, Chaudhury R, Rajwant KK. Rapid in vitro multiplication and conservation of Garcinia indica: a tropical medicinal tree species. Sci Hort. 2005;106(4):539–553. doi: 10.1016/j.scienta.2005.05.002. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Mok M. Cytokinins: Chemistry, Activity, and Function. CRC Press; 1994. Cytokinins and Plant Development: an Overview; pp. 155–166. [Google Scholar]
- 51.Nordstrom A, Tarkowski P, Tarkowska D, Norbaek R, Astot C, Dolezal K, Sberg G. Auxin regulation of cytokinin biosynthesis in Arabidopsis thaliana: a factor of potential importance for auxin-cytokinin regulated development. PNAS. 2004;101(21):8039–8044. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0402504101. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Ohki S, Sawaki S. The effects of inorganic salts and growth regulators on in vitro shoot proliferation and leaf chlorophyll content of Delphinium cardinale . Sci Hort. 1999;81(2):149–158. doi: 10.1016/S0304-4238(99). [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Ozel CA, Arslan O. Efficient micropropagation of English shrub rose “Heritage” under in vitro condition. Int J Agric Biol. 2006;8(5):626–629. [Google Scholar]
- 54.Panjaitan SB, Aziz MA, Rashid AA, Saleh NM. In-vitro plantlet regeneration from shoot tip of field-grown hermaphrodite papaya (Carica papaya L. cv. Eksotika) Int J Agric Biol. 2007;9(6):827–832. [Google Scholar]
- 55.Rademacher W, Graebe JE, Schwenen L. On the Mode of Action of Tetcylacis and Triazole Growth Retardants. In: Henett R, Lawerence DK, editors. Monograph—British Plant Growth Regulation Group; 1984. pp. 1–11. [Google Scholar]
- 56.Rai MK, Shanker JS, Uma J. Shoot multiplication and plant regeneration of guava (Psidium guajava L.) from nodal explants of in vitro raised plantlets. J Fruit Ornam Plant Res. 2009;17(1):29–38. [Google Scholar]
- 57.Roberts AV, Matthews D. The preparation in vitro of chrysanthemum for transplantation to soil. V: The 2S, 3S enantiomer of paclobutrazol improves resistance to desiccation. Plant Cell Tissue Org Cult. 1995;40(2):191–193. [Google Scholar]
- 58.Rogg LE, Lasswell J, Bartel B. A gain-of-function mutation in IAA28 suppresses lateral root development. Plant Cell. 2001;13(3):465–480. doi: 10.1105/tpc.13.3.465. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Ronzhina ES. Effect of 6-benzylaminopurine on the structure of photosynthetic apparatus of Faba bean Vicia faba L. Appl Biochem Microbiol. 2003;39(4):411–417. doi: 10.1023/A:1024580804275. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Roy J, Banerjee N. Induction of callus and plant regeneration from shoot tip explants of Dendrobium fimbriatum Lidl. var. oculatum Hk. f. Sci Hort. 2003;97(3-4):333–340. doi: 10.1016/S0304-4238(02). [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Ruegger M, Dewey E, Hobbie L, Brown D, Bernasconi P, Turner J, Muday G, Estelle M. Reduced naphthylphthalamic acid binding in the tir3 mutant of Arabidopsis is associated with a reduction in polar auxin transport and diverse morphological defects. Plant Cell. 1997;9(5):745–757. doi: 10.1105/tpc.9.5.745. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Russell AD, Chopra I. Understanding Antibacterial Action and Resistance. New York: Ellis Horwood; 1990. [Google Scholar]
- 63.Ruzic DV, Vujovic TI. The effects of cytokinin types and their concentration on in vitro multiplication of sweet cherry cv. Lapins (Prunus avium L.) HortScience. 2008;35(1):12–21. [Google Scholar]
- 64.Schmulling T, Werner T, Riefler M, Krupková E, Bartrina Y, Manns I. Structure and function of cytokinin oxidase/dehydrogenase genes of maize, rice, Arabidopsis and other species. J Plant Res. 2003;116(3):241–252. doi: 10.1007/s10265-003-0096-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Siddique I, Anis M. Direct plant regeneration from nodal explants of Balanites aegyptiaca L. Del.: a valuable medicinal tree. New Forests. 2009;37(1):53–62. doi: 10.1007/s11056-008-9110-y. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Singh K, Arora JS. In vitro multiplication of Chrysanthemum morifolium Ramat cv. Riot. J Ornam Hort. 1995;2(1-2):63–68. [Google Scholar]
- 67.Skirvin RM, Kouider M, Joung A, et al. The Tissue Culture of Apple Malus domestica Borkh. In: Bajaj YP, editor. Biotechnology in Agriculture and Forestry. 1986. pp. 183–197. [Google Scholar]
- 68.Steel RGD, Torrie JH, Boston MA. Principles and Procedures of Statistics: a Biometric Approach. 3rd Ed. McGraw Hill Book Co. Inc.; 1997. pp. 178–182. [Google Scholar]
- 69.Taiz L, Zeiger E. Plant Physiology. 3rd Ed. Los Angeles: Sinauer Associates, Inc.; 2002. Cytokinins: Regulators of Cell Division; p. 501. [Google Scholar]
- 70.Teale WD, Paponov IA, Palme K. Auxin in action: signalling, transport and the control of plant growth and development. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2006;7(11):847–859. doi: 10.1038/nrm2020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Tim D, Narendra S, Roonald HW, Upodhaya A. Promotion and adventitious root formation on cuttings by paclobutrazol. HortScience. 1985;20(5):883–884. [Google Scholar]
- 72.Vincent KA, Mathew KM, Hariharan M. Micropropagation of Kaempferia galanga L. a medicinal plant. Plant Cell Tissue Org Cult. 1992;28(2):229–230. doi: 10.1007/BF00055522. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 73.Vuylsteker C, Leleu O, Rambour S. Influence of BAP and NAA on the expression of nitrate reductase in excised chicory roots. J Exp Bot. 1997;48(5):1079–1085. doi: 10.1093/jxb/48.5.1079. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 74.Waseem K, Jilani MS, Khan MS. Rapid plant regeneration of chrysanthemum (Chrysanthemum morifolium I.) through shoot tip culture. Afr J Biotechnol. 2009;8(9):1871–1877. [Google Scholar]
- 75.Weisman Z, Riov J, Epstein E. Characterization and rooting ability of indole-3-butyric acid conjugates formed during rooting of mung bean cuttings. Plant Physiol. 1988;91(3):1080–1084. doi: 10.1104/pp.91.3.1080. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76.Woodward AW, Bartel B. Auxin: regulation, action, and interaction. Ann Bot Lond. 2005;95(5):707–735. doi: 10.1093/aob/mci083. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77.Yakimova E, Toteva VK, Groshkoff I, Ivanova G. Effect of BA and CPPU on protease and α amylase activity of in vitro cultured explants of Rosa hybrida L. Bulg J Plant Physiol. 2000;26:39–47. [Google Scholar]
- 78.Yildiz M, Er C. The effect of sodium hypochlorite solutions on in vitro seedling growth and shoot regeneration of flax Linum usitatissimum . Naturwissenchaften. 2002;89(6):259–261. doi: 10.1007/s00114-002-0310-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79.Ziv M. Morphogenic control of plants micropropagated in bioreactor cultures and its possible impact on accilimatization. Acta Hort. 1992;319:119–124. [Google Scholar]