Table 3.

Comparison of Three- Versus Two-Dimensional Echocardiography

First Author (Ref. #) Substudy		N	3D Echocardiography						2D Echocardiography
			R -Values			Bland-Altman*			R-Values			Bland-Altman*
			EDV	EDS	EF	EDV (ml)	ESV (ml)	EF (%)	EDV	ESV	EF	EDV (ml)	ESV (ml)	EF (%)
Jenkins et al. (12)
Non-contrast	1a	50	N/A	N/A	N/A	−15 ± 36	−9 ± 24	0 ± 6	N/A	N/A	N/A	−41 ± 42	−22 ± 36	−2 ± 8
Contrast	1b	50	N/A	N/A	N/A	−6 ± 28	−3 ± 20	0 ± 6	N/A	N/A	N/A	−18 ± 38	−8 ± 32	−2 ± 8
Chukwu et al. (16)
Normals 8-plane	5a	35	0.99	0.95	0.79	−1 ± 10	−4 ± 11	2 ± 8	0.50	0.86	0.23	−38 ± 51	−25 ± 26	9 ± 16
Normals contours	5b	35	0.99	0.95	0.84	1 ± 6	−2 ± 10	2 ± 7	0.50	0.86	0.23	−38 ± 51	−25 ± 26	9 ± 16
MI 8-plane	5c	34	0.97	0.97	0.90	−7 ± 35	−8 ± 33	1 ± 14	0.79	0.86	0.86	−58 ± 81	−46 ± 73	5 ± 18
MI contours	5d	34	0.97	0.97	0.90	−5 ± 33	−4 ± 31	0 ± 14	0.79	0.86	0.86	−58 ± 81	−46 ± 73	5 ± 18
Bicudo et al. (17)	6	20	0.94	0.95	0.83	−4 ± 16	0 ± 10	−2 ± 11	0.89	0.88	0.75	1 ± 23	−0 ± 14	−1 ± 14
Jenkins et al. (19)	8	30	0.89	0.92	0.92	−15 ± 31	−8 ± 26	−1 ± 7	0.72	0.79	0.65	−57 ± 40	−26 ± 33	−5 ± 12
Jenkins et al. (22)
On-line	11a	110	0.78	0.86	0.64	−44 ± 35	−21 ± 28	−2 ± 10	0.71	0.8	0.61	−70 ± 39	−34 ± 33	−3 ± 11
Off-line	11b	110	0.86	0.91	0.81	−15 ± 28	−10 ± 22	−1 ± 8	0.68	0.78	0.70	−70 ± 39	−34 ± 33	−3 ± 11
Jacobs et al. (23)	12	50	0.96	0.97	0.93	−14 ± 34	−7 ± 32	−1 ± 13	0.89	0.92	0.86	−23 ± 58	−15 ± 48	0.8 ± 19
Gutierrez-Chico et al. (25)	14	35	0.99	0.99	0.98	−13 ± 34	−10 ± 25	N/A	0.78	0.86	0.92	−25 ± 132	−21 ± 107	3 ± 18
Jenkins et al. (26)	15	50	N/A	N/A	N/A	−4 ± 29	−3 ± 18	0 ± 7	N/A	N/A	N/A	−54 ± 33	−28 ± 28	−1 ± 13
Marsan et al. (32)	21	52	0.97	0.98	0.97	−22 ± 40	−20 ± 40	1 ± 5	0.94	0.95	0.96	−41 ± 49	−33 ± 45	1 ± 5

^*Rounded to nearest milliliter.

EDV = end-diastolic volume; EF = ejection fraction; ESV = end-systolic volume; N/A = not available.