Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Sep 16.
Published in final edited form as: Urology. 2010 Mar 7;76(3):559–564. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2009.09.090

Table 2.

Final Multivariate Models of Emotional and Physical Well-Being‡

Step Variables Levels Emotional-Well Being‡‡‡ Physical Well-Being‡‡‡

Estimate SE 95% CI Estimate SE 95% CI

1 Age [Continuous] 0.09** 0.03 0.04, 0.15 0.11** 0.04 0.04, 0.19
Employment Employed vs not employed 0.32 0.49 −0.64, 1.29 0.18 0.67 −1.15, 1.51
Income >$50,000 vs <$50,000 −0.40 0.50 −1.38, 0.58 0.54 0.68 −0.81, 1.90
Marital status Married vs not married 0.42 0.54 −0.65, 1.48 −0.71 0.74 −2.18, 0.76
Education ≥ Some college vs ≤ high school −0.07 0.45 −0.95, 0.82 −0.16 0.62 −1.38, 1.05

2 Time since dx [Continuous] 0.01 0.008 −0.004, 0.03 −0.007 0.01 −0.03, 0.01
TNM stage T2/T3 vs T1 0.38 0.42 −0.46, 1.21 0.41 0.58 −0.74, 1.56
Gleason score > 6 vs ≤ 6 −0.08 0.40 −0.87, 0.72 0.37 0.55 −0.72, 1.47
PSA [Continuous] −0.009 0.04 −0.09, 0.08 −0.02 0.06 −2.57, 0.03
Tx status7 Initiated/completed vs pending 1.04* 0.48 0.10, 1.99 −1.26† 0.66 −0.14, 0.10

3 Perceived Stress [Continuous] −0.36*** 0.03 −0.43, −0.29 −0.31*** 0.05 −0.40, −0.22
Religiosity [Continuous] 0.002 0.03 −0.06, 0.06 0.004 0.04 −0.08, 0.08

4 Race African American vs white 1.32* 0.59 0.16, 2.48 −0.24 0.81 −1.84, 1.36
‡‡‡

Recruitment site did not have a significant effect on emotional (p=0.35) or physical well-being (p=0.13)

***

p<0.001

**

p<0.01

*

p<0.05

p<0.10