Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Sep 16.
Published in final edited form as: Am J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2009 Dec;17(12):1068–1076. doi: 10.1097/JGP.0b013e3181b972d1

TABLE 2.

Changes in Cost-Related Nonadherence and Spending Less on Basic Needs Following Part D Implementation

Group Depressive Symptoms No Depressive Symptoms Depressive Symptoms / No Depressive Symptoms (Part D effect)
Outcome measure Test 2005 vs. 2004 2006 vs. 2005 2006-2005 vs. 2005-2004 2005 vs. 2004 2006 vs. 2005 2006-2005 vs. 2005-2004 2006-2005 vs. 2005-2004
Cost-related nonadherence OR (95% CI) 1.01 (0.84, 1.21) 0.86 (0.75, 0.98) 0.85 (0.65, 1.12) p=0.244 0.89 (0.82, 0.96) 0.74 (0.65, 0.84) 0.83 (0.71, 0.97) p=0.022 0.98 (0.73, 1.32) p=0.896
Wald t-test (df) 0.09 (99) −2.23 (99) −1.17 (82) −3.06 (99) −4.62 (99) −2.32 (82) −0.13 (82)
Spent less on basic needs OR (95% CI) 1.08 (0.88, 1.32) 0.77 (0.65, 0.92) 0.72 (0.52, 0.99) p=0.044 1.09 (0.95, 1.24) 0.55 (0.46, 0.65) 0.50 (0.40, 0.63) p<0.001 0.70 (0.49, 1.01) p=0.055
Wald t-test (df) 0.73 (99) −2.92 (99) −2.04 (82) 1.20 (99) −7.02 (99) −5.95 (82) −1.94 (82)

* Models adjusted for sex, age group, income level, race, general health status, number of physical morbidities, and number of years’ participation in MCBS

Significant at p<0.05

Ratios <1 suggest the decline in CRN among those with depressive symptoms is less than the decline among those without depressive symptoms