Skip to main content
. 2013 Aug 26;110(37):15115–15120. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1307154110

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3.

Predictive power of neural activity from averaged transfer functions for CMRO2 (hCMRO2) and CBF (hCBF) derived, respectively, from MUA and LFP as the inputs. Neural response was predicted by the Wiener deconvolution algorithm (SI Materials and Methods) using the average of transfer functions obtained across layers for a given modality. (A) Comparison of measured and predicted MUA responses from cortical lamina by using the average hCMRO2. (B) Comparison of measured and predicted LFP responses from cortical lamina by using the average hCBF. The predictive power of neural responses was based on a residual analysis (SI Materials and Methods), which was based on the difference between predicted and measured neural responses. Fig. S4 and Table S4 give details on predictive powers of all other transfer functions.