Skip to main content
. 2013 Apr 10;33(15):6401–6411. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1001-12.2013

Figure 4.

Figure 4.

No effect of Hdac1 or Hdac2 KO on motor learning or episodic memory. A, B, Latencies to fall off the rotarod were not different for Hdac1 (A, n = 12) or Hdac2 (B, n = 12) KOs compared with CTL (n = 12, n = 10), indicating normal motor coordination and learning. C, SOR/NOR task performance in Hdac1 KO mice (C, n = 11) was similar to CTL (n = 10). D, E, Hdac2 KO mice (n = 10) did not exhibit differential memory for was similar to CTL (n = 10, n = 12) as indicated by no difference in the ratio of time spent with the moved (spatial) or novel object when provided with either 10 or 3 min training sessions for object familiarization. Hyphenated line indicates chance performance.