Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 May 1.
Published in final edited form as: Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2013 Apr 1;6(3):466–477. doi: 10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.112.000259

Table 2.

Findings on exercise and pharmacologic stress and myocardial perfusion imaging dichotomized by presence or absence of chest pain or shortness of breath

Characteristic Exercise Stress (n=200) Pharmacologic Stress (n=375)
Symptomatic
(n (%))
Asymptomatic
(n(%))
P-value Symptomatic
(n(%))
Asymptomatic
(n(%))
P-value
Total patients 163 37 246 129
METS achieved (median (25th 75th percentiles)* 8.0 (6.6, 10.0) 8.6 (7.0, 10.1) 0.61 Not applicable.
    ≥10 METS achieved* 37 (23.1) 7 (58.3) 0.007
Peak exercise heart rate 144 (133, 157) 140 (132, 151) 0.31
Maximum systolic BP* 199 (180, 222) 204 (178, 223) 0.64
Maximum diastolic BP* 85 (75, 97) 89 (73, 100) 0.49
Chest pain during stress 23 (14.1) 1 (2.7) 0.054
≥1mm stress ST-depression 19 (11.7) 7 (18.9) 0.28 8 (3.2) 5 (3.9) 0.77
LVEF* 63 (59, 67) 62 (58, 67) 0.28 63 (54, 68) 63 (54, 68) 0.73
    LVEF<45%* 8 (4.9) 5 (13.5) 0.068 25 (10.2) 7 (5.4) 0.12
ESV index ≥25 mL/m2 *, 19 (12.0) 8 (22.9) 0.11 44 (18.0) 29 (22.7) 0.28
Summed stress score 0.023 0.51
    0–3 142 (87.1) 26 (70.3) 202 (82.1) 109 (84.5)
    4–8 9 (5.5) 6 (16.2) 16 (6.5) 10 (7.8)
    >8 12 (7.4) 5 (13.5) 28 (11.4) 10 (7.8)
Summed rest score 0.084 0.51
    0–3 154 (94.5) 33 (89.2) 219 (89.0) 119 (92.3)
    4–8 7 (4.3) 1 (2.7) 13 (5.3) 6 (4.7)
    >8 2 (1.2) 3 (8.1) 14 (5.7) 4 (3.1)
*

BP=blood pressure; ESV=end-systolic volume; LVEF=left-ventricular ejection fraction; METS=metabolic equivalents.

End-systolic volume indexis missing in 3asymptomatic and 5 symptomatic patients in the exercise cohort and 1 asymptomatic and 1 symptomatic patient in the pharmacologic cohort.